Saturday, August 12, 2023

Editorial: Demagogue’s Demise

 Special Counsel Jack Smith has finally brought the “main event” indictments in US District Court for the District of Columbia, charging Donald J. Trump with four more felonies: 

• Conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government; 

• Conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified; 

• Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct the certification of the electoral vote; and 

• Conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one’s vote count.

The Aug. 1 indictments bring to 78 the total of felony charges brought against Trump in federal and state courts so far, and Trump is likely to blow past 80 felonies when Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis reports grand jury results from Atlanta, Ga.

In addition to Trump, the indictment implicates six unnamed conspirators who may be charged later; but it also indirectly implicates Republican officials who have embraced the Big Lie that claimed Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election from Trump, and now defend his “First Amendment right to lie.”

Trump claims Jack Smith, acting for the Biden administration, was criminalizing his free speech, but Smith addressed that claim in the first page of the 45-page indictment. 

“The defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won,” Smith wrote. Trump had a constitutional right to tell his “prolific lies” – falsely claiming, for instance, that “there had been substantial fraud in certain states, such as that large numbers of dead, non-resident, non-citizen, or otherwise ineligible voters had cast ballots, or that voting machines had changed votes for the Defendant to votes for Biden.” All those lies were covered by the First Amendment. “Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.”

While Trump continues to insist he believe the election was stolen, the indictment lists the following – mostly Republicans — as among those who told Trump the election was legitimate: the vice president, senior leaders of the Justice Department, the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, senior White House attorneys, senior campaign staffers, state legislators and officials, and state and federal courts.

Trump disregarded them all, and used his position to weaponize his lies in an attempt to overthrow democracy. He crossed the line when he tried to pressure state officials to ignore election results and change electoral votes for Biden. He plotted to organize fake slates of electors in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin). And he pressured Vice President Pence to refuse to certify the election. Then, after it became public on Jan. 6 that the vice president would not fraudulently alter the election results, “a large and angry crowd — including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results — violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.”

As the indictment states, “The defendant’s knowingly false statements were integral to his criminal plans.”

Of course, under the law, Trump is considered innocent until proven guilty, but Smith has presented a pretty solid case. And, unlike the previous federal indictments in Florida relating to Trump’s refusal to return classified documents he had taken from the White House, and his alleged obstruction of that investigation, the Jan. 6 case shouldn’t be delayed by concerns over security clearances of defense attorneys and the sensitive nature of the documents at issue.

Republicans aren’t helping their case by embracing Trump’s First Amendment defense that he is being charged for his beliefs. They remain in thrall to the grifter who emerged in 2015 as a demagogic force in the Republican Party, who took advantage of the racist backlash against the presidency of Barack Obama. 

Description of Trump as a populist is ridiculous, as his whole shtick was to distract White working-class voters from the malignant works of corporate monopolists. When he unexpectedly won the presidency, he helped billionaires consolidate their control of the party, and rewarded them with a major tax break as he completed the transition of the Republican Party into the Greedy Oligarch Party. 

Trump’s cult is the opposite of the Populist movement, whose roots go back to the 1880s when farmers formed alliances to challenge the power of railroads, corporate monopolies and bankers in what became known as the Gilded Age. Farmers’ alliances organized to educate working people — Black and White, male and female — to be informed voters. They became a force on the left to force reforms on the Democratic and Republican parties heading into the 20th century.

When they organized as a political party in 1890, the Populists called for corporate regulation, a progressive income tax on the rich and increased funding for public education — reforms that were achieved in the 20th century, but have been under attack by Republicans since the Reagan administration. The Populists also called for direct election of senators and female members pressed for women’s suffrage. The People’s Party largely fell apart after the 1896 election but Populists helped grow the progressive wings of the Democratic and Republican parties and many of their proposals made it into Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s.

Trump is no populist, but he has fooled enough people to keep him in a commanding lead to win the Republican nomination again, and polls show him basically tied with President Biden, who has revived the economy since the COVID pandemic, but he isn’t getting credit for it because working families still can’t pay the rent, and gas prices are going back up as oil companies seek record profits, and the corporate media won’t tell them why that is not Biden’s fault.

We can hope for quick trial on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election. In the meantime we have a year and a quarter to convince friends and neighbors it’s worth their while to vote for Biden and the Democrats in 2024, because we can’t afford giving Trump and his radical enablers another grab at power. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, September 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us



Selections from the September 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/Richard D. Wolff 

Why capitalism is leaving the US in search of more profit

EDITORIAL 
Demagogue’s demise


FRANK LINGO 
It’s not the humidity — it’s the heat

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
When you have no boots to strap

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Hot enough for you? Just wait!

DISPATCHES
TPP opens new customer service office.
Two-thirds of Americans think Jan. 6 charges are serious, but less than half think Trump should drop out.
DeSantis says he would start ‘slitting throats on Day One’ if elected president.
Biden administration delays plans to restock nation’s oil reserves.
July jobs report: Good news keeps on coming.
Pro-Trump megadonor boosts RFK Jr. campaign.
GOP's 'fiscal vandalism and political sabotage' prompts second-ever US credit downgrade.
GOP wages war on food aid, data shows 35% rise in hunger ...

ART CULLEN 
Senator, are you there? We’re good. No problems. Just vote ‘aye’

ALAN GUEBERT
Russian roulette — with missiles, drones and food

KASSIDY JACOBS
Another chance to reduce child poverty

JOHN YOUNG
Better a bad dog than a mad dog

MEL GURTOV
China’s faltering economy and its implications

GENE NICHOL
The thin reed of hope in North Carolina

DICK POLMAN
‘Dishonesty, fraud and deceit’: Trump indictment reads like ‘fascism for dummies’


TOM CONWAY
Leaping onto the infrastructure bandwagon

LEW KINGSBURY
George H.W. Bush’s 9/11 legacy must be remembered

ROBERT KUTTNER
Banks: The weak spot in a strong recovery

SETH SANDRONSKY
California academic workers are rising up

SONALI KOLHATKAR
Five critical lessons from UPS’s union workers


THOM HARTMANN
The biggest issue for 2024: Can humanity survive Trump & the GOP? 

ROBERT C. KOEHLER
Immigration policy wrapped in razor wire, Robert Frost

FATIMA GUTIERREZ
Anxious about the climate? There’s a solution

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Junk insurance: One more legacy from President Trump

SAM URETSKY
Big conclusions drawn from small study

WAYNE O’LEARY
Ennui on the hustings

DRAMA REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
Judgment at Sheffield in ‘One Moment of Freedom’ 


JASON SIBERT 
Getting up to speed on hypersonic weapons

JYOTSNA NAIDU 
Democracy needs healthy debates about war and peace


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
Small town spin

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
Something there is that loves a border

STEPHEN TRIMBLE 
The problem that just won’t go away

ROB PATTERSON 
‘Oppenheimer’ reminds how brilliant and compelling high-art cinema can be

ELWOOD WATSON
Visit Florida to learn about the benefits of slavery

MOVIE REVIEW/Laura Clawson
It’s ‘Barbie,’ but the right-wing freakout is very much about Ken
and more ...

From The Progressive Populist, September 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Sunday, July 30, 2023

Editorial: Trump Enablers Get Desperate

 While Donald Trump faces dozens of felony charges in New York and Florida and grand juries in Georgia and the District of Columbia are considering more felony charges relating to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, Trump and his Republican henchmen and women are increasingly desperate to implicate President Joe Biden in criminal activity to keep up the “both sides do it” charade.

Trump’s rants on his “Truth Social” website became increasingly unhinged after he received a “target letter” from the Department of Justice July 16, indicating a grand jury in Washington was close to indicting him over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and broader efforts to overturn the election results.

“Every time you see these Radical Lunatics and their partners in the Fake News Media talking about the ‘Trials and Tribulations’ of President Donald J. Trump, please remember that it is all a coordinated HOAX… in order to STEAL ANOTHER ELECTION through PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT at levels never seen before in the U.S.,” Trump ranted July 23, adding, “[Attorney General] Merrick Garland, Deranged Jack Smith, and coordinating Democrat ‘Prosecutors’ in New York and Atlanta, have become the Campaign Managers for the most corrupt and incompetent President in United States history, Joe Biden!” 

Republicans in Congress have tried to dig up evidence implicating President Biden through Hunter Biden’s business activities while Joe Biden was vice president. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), new chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Judiciary chairman, and other Republicans have spent months chasing conspiracy theories in their probe of what Republicans call “the Biden crime family.”

In May the Trumpists found an informant they believed could provide incriminating details. Comer scheduled a press conference to unveil “devastating” information about Joe Biden’s imagined corruption. It would be “judgment day” for Biden, Comer said, predicting the scandal would make “Watergate look like jaywalking.”

The next day, Republicans released financial documents that showed Hunter was paid more than $10 million from foreign sources between 2015 and 2017. But they had no evidence of any corrupt action by Joe Biden in connection with any of his son’s business deals.

Later, Comer told Maria Bartiromo at Fox “News” the problem was an important anti-Biden witness had disappeared. “We’re hopeful that the informant is still there,” he said. Asked if his anti-Biden informant “is now missing,” Comer replied, “Well, we’re hopeful that we can find the informant.” He added, “Remember these informants are kind of in the spy business.”

Two months later, it turned out that the Republicans’ elusive informant was Gal Luft, a dual citizen of the US and Israel who has been charged with being an unregistered agent for China, trying to broker secret arms deals, violating US sanctions against Iran, and lying to federal agents. And he’s on the lam.

Of course, Republicans offered this as proof that federal law enforcement is part of an elaborate conspiracy to protect Democrats.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) released an FBI document relating to the Hunter Biden investigation July 20, in a reckless effort to hurt President Biden. The FD-1023 is used to record “raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources,” the FBI explained. The forms “do not represent the results of investigations, and “recording this information does not validate it [or] establish its credibility.” Releasing the forms could lead to threats against informants, the FBI warned. Grassley didn’t mind running that risk.

The form Grassley released, dated June 26, 2020, claims to be sourced from an unidentified businessman who was introduced to leadership at Burisma energy holdings in Ukraine in “late 2015 or early 2016” to help the company find a US company to purchase. During a meeting with Burisma leadership, the source claims he was told Hunter Biden was put on the company board to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.” When he asked why Hunter wasn’t doing the job of locating a US firm to purchase, he’s told that “Hunter is not that smart.” 

Finally, the source reported that Burisma executive Mykola Zlochevsky told him the company had to pay $5 million to Joe Biden and another $5 million to Hunter Biden because Burisma was being investigated by Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, and Burisma needed Biden to “deal with Shokin.”

However, there are a number of problems with these claims. First, Hunter Biden was not just the son of the vice president when he was placed on the board of Burisma in 2014; he had years of experience in lobbying, investment banking and corporate governance, which could help an energy company looking to expand internationally. And Shokin was fired in 2016, voted out by the Ukrainian parliament after Joe Biden made it clear that the US might withhold or delay assistance to Ukraine unless Shokin was removed. But Shokin was fired because he was not investigating cases of corruption when Ukrainian oligarchs were making off with billions. Both the US and UK governments had been pressuring Ukraine about Shokin for over a year before Joe Biden’s visit. In fact, what upset the UK government most was that Shokin was refusing to investigate Burisma.

The FBI had nearly seven months, under Trump’s DOJ, with his hand-picked FBI Director Christopher Wray, to check out the informant’s allegations, but agents apparently found nothing to back it up. 

Marcy Wheeler also explored the peculiarities of the legend of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which claims Hunter wandered into a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019, handed over a damaged laptop, completely forgot about it afterward, and the computer repairman eventually turned over the laptop to Rudy Giuliani.

Wheeler noted that in 2018 or early 2019, Hunter Biden was the target of a hack that gave an outside party access to his iCloud account, email accounts, and other data. While Hunter was receiving addiction treatment, with “limited” access online, someone was making technical changes to Hunter’s iCloud, Venmo and email accounts, raising doubts about the provenance of items found on the laptop. 

Hunter Biden made some bad decisions, and he may have profited off his father’s name, but he was not representing the US, and the only crimes traced to him by a federal prosecutor were failure to pay taxes and making a false statement to get a gun — which was not used in a violent act. Hunter Biden reached a plea bargain with the federal prosector to pay the back taxes and plead guilty on the gun charge. A fine and probation was expected, before a US District Judge in Delaware refused to accept the plea bargain July 26. 

We wouldn’t support Hunter for public office, but we don’t blame Joe Biden for continuing to support his only surviving son’s recovery from addiction. Republicans of good faith should turn their attention to actual crimes committed by Trump and his family. — JMC 

From The Progressive Populist, August 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the August 15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Nicole Carr and Lucas Waldron, ProPublica

How school board meetings became flashpoints for anger and chaos across the country

EDITORIAL 
Trump enablers get desperate


FRANK LINGO p. 3
Blood batteries power our phones

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR p. 4

DON ROLLINS p. 4
Is Black activism in shift? 

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen p. 5
This summer, don’t spread your carbon

DISPATCHES p. 5
No wonder Republicans believe in conspiracy theories.
If anyone benefits from Trump’s indictments, it’s Biden.
Dems’ growing dominance in college towns upends Republicans’ path to victory.
GOP spending cuts would kill 500,000 jobs, slam brakes on economy.
DeSantis attacks on Florida’s New College hit home as faculty flee.
Dems keep ahead of Trump’s pace with judicial nominees ...


ART CULLEN p. 6
Get me some more duct tape

ALAN GUEBERT p. 6
Climate change delay is climate change denial


DEB SITARSKY p. 7
What decades of social work taught me about poverty

JOHN YOUNG p. 7
My eye test for college admissions and hiring

GENE NICHOL p. 8
The Trumpian question for UNC administrators


DICK POLMAN p. 9
His fraudulency will soon be charged with new felonies. Some of his coup toadies already have.

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN p. 9
The Supreme Court’s gone rogue and Americans are suffering for it

TOM CONWAY p. 10
Suriving record heat

BELLA DEVAAN p. 10
Young people can’t sit on the sidelines on Social Security

DANIELLE BROWNE p. 10
Cultivating the next crop of America’s farmers


ROBERT KUTTNER p. 11
Radical problems and liberal solutions ­­­

PAUL ARMENTANO p. 11
Cannabis laws are changing. Drug testing must change too 


THOM HARTMANN p. 13
Are GOP governors killing their citizens to protect billionaires? 

DR. CINTLI p. 14
There is no such thing as humane bombs

SETH SANDRONSKY p. 14
Cal State University employees rally for better pay and benefits

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas p. 15
A new colonialism, a new raw material: Nurses

SAM URETSKY p. 15
AI can help make drugs better

WAYNE O’LEARY p. 16
Stealth revolution in health care

GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet p. 16
The nuclear debate

JOEL D. JOSEPH p. 16
Reopen the port of Odesa


N. GUNASEKARAN p. 17
The ill-effects of NATO’s eastward movement


BARRY FRIEDMAN p. 18
Trump’s luck

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson p. 18
Cage match, Libertarian style

RALPH NADER p. 19
Suggestions for progressives to become stronger


MARJORIE “SLIM” WOODRUFF p. 20
Too many tourists follow a leader

ROB PATTERSON p. 20
I’m bullish as hell on ‘The Bear’

ELWOOD WATSON p. 20
Republicans had a pretty racist week

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell p. 21
‘Oppenheimer’ doesn’t fully depict atomic bomb’s consequences

and more ...

From The Progressive Populist, August 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Friday, July 14, 2023

Editorial: Make College Affordable Again

 The six right wingers on the Supreme Court not only declared the end of affirmative action, which had tried to give qualified minorities access to higher education. They also snuffed out President Joe Biden’s attempt to provide relief for college grads who faced crushing debt when they got out of school.

When Biden in June 2022 announced his plan to cancel $10,000 worth of loans for people earning less than $125,000 a year, and another $10,000 for borrowers who had received Pell grants, which went to students who displayed “exceptional financial need,” it was estimated nearly 45% of borrowers, or 20 million people, would have their debt fully canceled.

For the remaining 55%, a new plan would offer more relaxed terms for loan repayment. “I just can’t underscore what a huge deal this is in millions of borrowers’ lives,” Kyra Taylor, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told ABC News in August 2022.

But many of those who paid off their loans couldn’t stand it.

“There are millions of Americans like me for whom debt forgiveness is an infuriating slap in the face after years of hard work and sacrifice,” Bethany Mandel wrote for Fox “News” June 15, 2022. “Those used to be qualities we encouraged as an American culture, and if Biden gets his way, we’ll be sending a very different message to the next generation.”

Forgiving those loans, we think, would send a message that we’re sorry we let the cost of college get so far out of control that students end up with demands to start payment on $100,000 or more on accumulated loans, in addition to their diplomas. 

The disgruntled college grads who repaid their loans should demand Republicans join Democrats in passing a bill to include a $10,000 rebate for those who paid off their loans, in addition to cancellation for those who are still in debt. Then, we could restore affordable higher education opportunities, which fueled the greatest economic boom in history in the 1950s and ’60s.

As World War II was drawing to a close, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 22, 1944, signed the GI Bill of Rights into law. It provided tuition and living expenses, as well as unemployment and housing assistance for returning veterans. It paid for 2.2 million veterans to attend colleges and universities, and 5.6 million got training for good jobs after they got home. (Of course, a disproportionate share of the benefits went to White veterans.) Economists later found that GI Bill veterans ended up paying $7 in taxes for every dollar spent to educate them, and the newly middle-class vets built the consensus that children of working-class families should have access to higher education. 

The National Defense Education Act was passed in 1958 and signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower to provide funding to colleges and universities and low-interest National Defense Student Loans to “promising, yet needy students” of mathematics, engineering and foreign languages, as well as those who desired to teach in elementary or secondary schools. The Act was amended in 1964 to provide loans to other students, and the Higher Education Act was passed in 1965 to provide more assistance to universities and financial assistance for students. University enrollment, which was only about a half million in 1940, grew to 7.6 million in 1970, helped by relatively low tuition at state universities. 

Many states kept their university tuition low, at least for their residents. Texans used to be proud that university costs were low enough that the children of working-class parents could pursue a college education. In 1970, the state paid 85% of the cost of running the state’s universities, and tuition and fees for the regular workload of 15 hours was $104 per semester for Texas residents.

Many Boomers have the federal and state support for public universities to thank for giving them access to colleges and universities.

But conservatives soured on education for the masses and Ronald Reagan led the movement to curb access to unversities. He was elected governor of California in 1966 with confrontational rhetoric toward the University of California sysstem. Reagan repeatedly vowed “to clean up the mess” at UC Berkeley, which had become a national center of organizing against the Vietnam War. Reagan cut the state’s higher education budgets until the UC Board of Regents was forced to approve the system’s first tuition charges in 1970.

The success of Reagan’s attacks on California public colleges inspired conservative politicians across the US, Jon Schwarz noted at TheIntercept.com Aug. 25, 2022. President Richard Nixon decried “campus revolt.” Vice President Spiro Agnew complained that, thanks to open admissions policies, “unqualified students are being swept into college on the wave of the new socialism.”

Roger A. Freeman, an educational adviser to Nixon who was born in 1904 in Vienna, Austria, and fled to the US after the rise of Hitler, was an economist who became a fixture in conservative politics, serving on the White House staff during both the Dwight Eisenhower and Nixon administrations. He helped Reagan in his 1970 re-election campaign, and Freeman said at an Oct. 29, 1970, press conference, less than a week before the election, “We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat. … That’s dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow [to go to college].”

“If not,” Freeman continued, “we will have a large number of highly trained and unemployed people.” Freeman also said — taking a highly idiosyncratic perspective on the cause of fascism —“that’s what happened in Germany. I saw it happen.”

So Reagan forced UC to charge tuition in 1970 and federal and bank officials demanded City University of New York charge tuition in 1976, as a condition for city bankruptcy relief.

After Reagan became president in 1981, he cut federal aid to public education and tried to abolish the US Department of Education. He reduced higher education funding by 25%., and the federal government’s involvement in student aid shifted from grants to loans. He also eliminated Social Security payments to full-time students who were children of disabled, retired or deceased workers.

In 2022-23, the average cost of attending college (tuition and fees, room and board, and allowances for books and supplies, transportation and other personal expenses) for full-time undergraduate students ranged from $19,230 for public two-year in-district students and $27,940 for public four-year in-state students to $45,240 for public four-year out-of-state students and $57,570 for private nonprofit four-year students, the College Board reported.

To restore the principle that every student should be able to pursue higher education according to their skills, state legislatures should step up to make public universities affordable to students working no more than 20 hours a week. At the current minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, that means tuition should be no more than $3,625 a semester (or $7,250 a year). And the federal government should restore generous financial aid to boost students coming from lower-income families. No longer should graduates get a note that they owe more than $100,000 along with their diploma. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, August 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

 

Selections from the August 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/Daniel Ross

Medicine residue is everywhere in our rivers and lakes — and fish are behaving strangely

EDITORIAL 
Make college affordable again


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

DON ROLLINS 
Africa: In peril from without

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Support your local dairies

DISPATCHES 
Biden acts to limit unexpected health costs.
A great jobs report and vindication of Bidenomics.
Inflation Reduction Act is turning us into renewable energy superpower.
Biden’s legislative wins a boon for battleground Democrats.
Corporate profits surged to $1 trillion a year as working people suffer ...

ART CULLEN
A little hope amidst the haze

ALAN GUEBERT
Supreme Court’s recent clean water ruling makes everything murkier


PHYLLIS BENNIS
A tale of two tragedies at sea

JOHN YOUNG 
A kill shot against democracy that missed

GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Unpack the court!

DICK POLMAN 
A homophobic trifecta: Fake facts, fake case, and a high court with cratering credibility 

GENE NICHOL 
Wounding mission accomplished

TOM CONWAY 
American workers demand Julie Su’s confirmation

SAM PIZZIGATI 
Want to reclaim the spirit of 1776? Reduce inequality

FRANK LINGO
Biden finally restoring species protections

ROBERT KUTTNER 
Will Tai prevail over the corporate undertow? 

THOM HARTMANN  
GOP: “How dare you tell the truth!”

DR. CINTLI 
Wars and interventions: Corruption, American style

ALLIYAH LUSUEGRO 
To clear the air, cut military spending

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
More egregiously woke books to ban

SAM URETSKY 
Big Pharma’s money talks

MARK ANDERSON 
Bad term at BlackRock

WAYNE O’LEARY 
Class, capitalism and democrats

SETH SANDRONSKY
Supreme Court decision provides challenge for Affirmative Action in California’s higher education


JOEL D. JOSEPH 
Proposed California reparations are not justified


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
When the chainsaw breaks

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
Putin’s fire sale

RALPH NADER 
What’s the matter with the ‘liberal press’?


RICK KNIGHT 
Restoring the land can feel a lot like fun

ROB PATTERSON 
The gifts of great books

BOOK REVIEW/Ken Winkes  
Poverty is a choice America makes

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
Salt of the Earth

From The Progressive Populist, August 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Tuesday, July 4, 2023

NRA Bull, by Kevin Kreneck

 

NRA Bull: With mass shootings happening much more frequently, and congressional refusal to do anything to stop the carnage, it has come to pass that we now live in an NRA world.

Monday, June 26, 2023

Turtle tank (inching toward war)

W
With diplomatic options running out, war between the Super Powers - USA, Russia, China - is looming. 
By Kevin Kreneck


 

Elephant Piranha

By Kevin Kreneck

As the Republican Party becomes more fractured and dysfunctional, 
it's becoming less and less recognizable as an organization.

 

Beached Whale Elephant

 

By Kevin Kreneck
Can the Republican Party survive its current state of dysfunction?

Friday, June 23, 2023

Editorial: GOP’s Disinfo Wars

 After former President Donald Trump was indicted for his misuse of classified documents, Republican leaders largely embraced Trump’s claims that he did nothing wrong and the charges are politically motivated. “Most Republicans believe we live in a country where Hillary Clinton did very similar things and nothing happened to her,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said June 11 in an ABC News interview.

Graham has come a long way since May 3, 2016, when he said, as Trump was on the verge of becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, ”If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed ... and we will deserve it.” Snopes.com noted that Graham repeatedly said Trump was not qualified to be president and that his involvement in the election process was damaging to the Republican party. 

Graham lost whatever principles he once had as he became one of Trump’s most vocal defenders. But his prophecy is coming true as the Republican National Committee is requiring candidates to pledge support for the party’s eventual nominee, even if he is criminally indicted in several jurisdictions.

After Trump’s June 13 arraignment in federal court in Miami on 37 felony counts, he was released on his own recognizance, which is very unusual for persons charged with violations of the Espionage Act. He also was allowed to keep his passport, which is even more unusual. The magistrate ordered Trump not to talk with his indicted aide, Walt Nauta about the case without their lawyers.

Upon his release, Trump went to a Cuban cafe in Miami, where he offered to buy lunch for patrons, then left without paying, and he flew back to New Jersey, where, at a fundraiser at his Bedminster, N.J. golf club, Trump claimed President Joe Biden had him arrested on “fake and fabricated charges.” There is no evidence Biden played any role in Trump’s case. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed career prosecutor Jack Smith as special counsel in the case to avoid perception of political interference.

Trump said the Presidential Records Act gave him “sole discretion” to “segregate personal materials,” but the National Archives and Records Administration said the documents at issue were clearly government property, not personal materials, and the charges were brought under the Espionage Act, which prohibits willful retention of national defense information and has been used to prosecute about a dozen people accused of holding on to classified documents over the past five years, the New York Times reported.

Trump claimed he “had every right to have these documents” because a judge in 2012 determined audiotapes Bill Clinton made of interviews with an author when Clinton was president, which were reportedly kept in in Clinton’s sock drawer in the White House, were personal records. But Trump’s Mar-a-Lago documents were labeled “classified” and clearly were related to national defense. They were not personal.

Trump also sought to revive the controversy over Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account for exchanges with her staff during her time as secretary of state, but the hundreds of classified documents stored in boxes in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence are not comparable, experts told PolitiFact. 

“The situation of Mrs. Clinton is, at most, only superficially comparable to what has been alleged against Mr. Trump in the federal indictment,” said Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases. 

PolitiFact noted Clinton’s email troubles started in 2014, when the Republican-dominated House Select Committee on Benghazi asked the State Department for all of her emails. The department didn’t have them all because Clinton used a personal email address housed on private servers in her Chappaqua, New York, home.

Clinton’s lawyers combed through the private server and turned over about 30,000 work-related emails to the State Department and deleted the rest, which Clinton said involved personal matters, such as her daughter’s wedding plans.

On July 5, 2016 — four months before the presidential election — the FBI released its findings on Clinton’s emails. In summary, it said classified information had been improperly transmitted, but carelessness, not an intent to skirt the law, was the cause. 

Then-FBI Director James Comey said of the 30,000 emails, 113 were determined to have contained classified information at the time they were sent. Comey said three of those had a marking indicating they were classified, and that 2,000 more were marked as classified after the fact by various agencies.

A 2018 Justice Department review of how the FBI handled its investigation noted that prosecutors found no evidence that Clinton and her colleagues ever intended to put classified materials into their email exchanges.

Ironically, suspected Russian hackers gained access to the State Department’s email system in 2015. The cyber attackers who breached the State Department’s system are also believed to be behind hacks on the White House’s email system, several other federal agencies, as well as the Democratic and Republican national committees. But the FBI said in August 2018 that it has no evidence Hillary Clinton’s private email server was compromised, even though then-President Trump tweeted a news report that alleged the Chinese had hacked it.

After leaving the White House, in January 2021, Trump took troves of boxes containing hundreds of classified documents to his home in Florida, according to the federal indictment released June 9, and he refused to return many of them when the National Archives and Records Administration requested them.

“Trump was not authorized to possess or retain those classified documents,” according to the indictment by a federal grand jury in Miami. And Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s residence and social club, “was not an authorized location” to keep, display or discuss classified documents.

Trump kept documents that included information about defense weapons capabilities, the United State’s nuclear programs and US military weaknesses throughout the property, the indictment said. The indictment includes photos of stacks of boxes stored in a ballroom, bathroom, shower, storage room and his bedroom. 

When instructed to turn over all documents with classification markings, Trump did not comply, the indictment said. Instead, investigators said Trump suggested his attorneys lie to the FBI and the grand jury, instructed his aide to move and conceal the boxes, and suggested his attorney destroy the documents.

Trump’s defense so far has consisted mainly of unfounded claims and diversions from his culpability. And the Greedy Oligarch Party has backed up his campaign of lies, to their shame.  — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, July 1-15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the July 1-15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Thom Hartmann

How much damage has the Trump-Putin collusion inflicted on America?

EDITORIAL
GOP’s Disinfo Wars


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
Cormac McCarthy: Disturbing

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Debt ceiling still needs to be dealt with

DISPATCHES
RNC sticks with loyalty pledge to accused criminal. 
Bernie Kerik pitched Trump chief of staff on ‘$5 to $8’ million plan to reverse Trump’s 2020 loss. 
Texas nullifies local rules requiring water breaks for workers as temps soar. 
Biden admin implores states to slow Medicaid cuts after more than 1 million enrollees dropped. 
Penn GOP lawmaker’s lawsuit against newspaper backfires as it exposes damning 2020 election emails. 
Major labor unions endorse Biden for 2024 ....


ART CULLEN 
The Democrats’ long wander into the weeds in Iowa

ALAN GUEBERT 
Happy bacon, unhappy blueberries, and Washington’s revolving door


KAREN DOLAN
Next time, abolish the debt ceiling

JOHN YOUNG
He should pay for defilling our property


DICK POLMAN 
Let the MAGA cultists dwell where the sun don’t shine. Politically, their sun god is going down.

TOM CONWAY 
Biden protected working people

SAM PIZZIGATI
How contractor CEOs get rich off taxpayers

GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Why we must fight


ROBERT KUTTNER 
Biden, student debt, and the 2024 election

GENE NICHOL 
Tar Heel war on democracy rages

MARILYN W. THOMPSON
Voting maps throughout the Deep South may be redrawn after surprise Supreme Court ruling


SONALI KOLHATKAR
Low pay and a four-day workweek is not a great deal


DR. CINTLI 
The White House creates a blueprint to end racial violence?

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas 
Whither common sense? Four health test cases

SAM URETSKY 
Robert Kennedy Jr. is not his father

JAKE JOHNSON 
Top US companies admit to hiking prices to pad their profits: Analysis

WAYNE O’LEARY
Zombie banks and rogue bankers

DEDRICK ASANTE-MUHAMMAD
The boldest step to close the racial wealth divide in generations

FRANK LINGO 
Plastic recycling is a gigantic fraud


N. GUNASEKARAN 
Will multiple currency blocs emerge to challenge the dollar?

JOEL D. JOSEPH 
Merger of PGA and LIV Golf is an antitrust violation and a human rights disaster


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
The shelf life of outrage

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
The blob that ate DeSatan


GARY WOCKNER
Boondoggle on the Colorado River

ROB PATTERSON 
Dylan explores philosophy of song

SETH SANDRONSKY 
Combating COVID-19: Pandemics, power and profits

ALEX LAWSON 
Big Pharma CEOs are killing Americans for profit. Here’s how Biden can stop them

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell
“Americonned’ explores the gap between billionaires and ordinary people

From The Progressive Populist, July 1-15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Friday, May 26, 2023

Editorial: Docs Flee Red States

 Women in Republican-ruled states may find that physicians willing to put up with political harassment and possible criminal charges for using their expertise to treat maternity cases are fewer and farther between.

A recent survey found most third- and fourth-year medical students planning to practice in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYNs), as well as prospective surgeons and specialists in internal medicine, say they do not plan to practice in states that have banned or restricted abortion, Erika Edwards reported for NBC News May 18. The survey of 494 medical students in 32 states was conducted by third-year medical student Ariana Traub, currently attending Emory University’s School of Medicine. She found 57.9% of respondents “were unlikely or very unlikely to apply to a single residency program in a state with abortion restrictions,” while over 76% said access to abortion care would influence their decision on where they pursue their residencies. 

Edwards reports: “The reluctance to be a medical resident — young doctors who train in hospitals or clinics after graduating medical school — in states with abortion bans could further strain health care shortages in many parts of the country.”

The US already faces a shortage of between 37,800 and 124,000 doctors in coming years, according to the American Association of Medical Colleges. There was also a significant drop in the number of medical students pursuing OB/GYN residencies in states with strong abortion policies.

Faced with the prospect of being told they cannot practice medicine the way they were taught — and they face criminal charges for doing so — students are electing to leave or avoid those states that have criminalized or otherwise prohibited abortion care. Dr. Beverly Gray, residency director at Duke University’s School of Medicine, explained the dilemma facing these future doctors: 

“It is hard to walk into work every day and be told that you can’t provide the care that might save a patient’s life,” Gray said. “There’s tremendous moral injury with being put in that situation, to be asked to care for people and not allowed to do the right thing.”

Edwards notes these (mostly younger) students also weigh their own personal circumstances when deciding where to practice: “In fact, 72.7% of respondents said that abortion access changes would likely or very likely influence where they would start a family.”

An exodus could affect broader medical coverage for women who rely on OB-GYNs for routine and urgent gynecological care unrelated to pregnancy, such as menstrual disorders, endometriosis, and pelvic pain.

The same soul-searching by prospective and current physicians described in Traub’s survey is prompting alarms in many red states, particularly in Texas. 

Anticipating the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Texas banned all abortions, with only narrow yet vague exceptions to save the life of the pregnant person and a potential penalty of life in prison for offending physicians.

“It meant no longer providing the standard of care that we would have prior to Dobbs,” Leah Wilson, who had worked as a labor and delivery nurse at a San Antonio hospital for about a year and a half, told Sophie Novack of Slate (March 21). “It meant patients sitting there for days, actively losing nonviable pregnancies, and us waiting for something to go bad enough that we could help them.”

Wilson left her job soon after. “There were a couple of cases just within a few weeks of each other that I really, really, really struggled with,” she said, including a patient who miscarried at 19 weeks pregnant. “And it was enough to say, You know what? I’m not doing this anymore.”

Almost every provider Novack spoke with said they have thought about leaving their practice or leaving Texas in the wake of S.B. 8, the state law that allowed outsiders to seek bounties for reporting abortions, and Dobbs. Several have already moved or stopped seeing patients in Texas, at least in large part because of the abortion bans. 

“If I ever touch a patient again, it won’t be in the state of Texas,” said Charles Brown, chair of ​​the Texas district of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), who stopped seeing patients last year after decades working as a maternal fetal medicine specialist. Many of those Novack spoke with who haven’t left yet are still thinking about it regularly—people who have family and homes and lives in Texas and would not otherwise have considered moving.

In 2022, 15% of Texas’ 254 counties had no doctor, according to data from the state health department, and about two-thirds had no OB-GYN. Texas has one of the most significant physician shortages in the country, with a shortfall expected to increase by more than 50% over the next decade, according to the state’s projections. The shortage of registered nurses, around 30,000, is expected to nearly double over the same period. Already, Texans in large swaths of the state must drive hours for medical care, including to give birth. According to recent research from the nonprofit March of Dimes, it is among the worst states for maternity care access, which has gotten worse in the past two years, mostly due to a loss of obstetrics providers.

Texas has experienced the most rural hospital closures in the US in recent years. Of the remainder, just 40% of Texas hospitals still have labor and delivery services.

Other policies and factors have stretched providers in Texas for many years, from having the highest uninsured rate in the country to low Medicaid reimbursement rates to the demonization of science. recent attacks on transgender health care, and now the abortion bans, Tom Banning, CEO of the Texas Academy of Family Physicians, told Novack. “The first rule of holes, when you’re trying to get out of the hole, is to stop digging,” he said. “We just continue to dig the hole that we’re in deeper.”

More than a dozen Texas women have joined the Center for Reproductive Rights’ lawsuit against the Texas law, which prohibits abortions unless a mother’s life is at risk — an exception that is not clearly defined. Texas doctors who perform abortions risk life in prison and fines of up to $100,000, leaving many women with providers who are unwilling to even discuss terminating a pregnancy.

“Our hope is that it will allow physicians at least a little more comfort when it comes to patients in obstetrical emergencies who really need an abortion where it’s going to effect their health, fertility or life going forward,” Molly Duane, the lead attorney on the case, told the Associated Press. “Almost all of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit tell similar stories about their doctors saying, if not for this law, I’d give you an abortion right now.”

Dr. Brown worries that, absent clarity and changes from state leaders, a mass exodus could soon occur. “We have not had the front-page photo of the doctor in handcuffs yet. When that happens, I think that will be the napalm,” he said. “Once that first arrest is on the front page of the paper, that will be a defining moment for a lot of people.”

And hard-right Republican leaders can take credit for making Texas more complicated for problem pregnancies. — JMC 

From The Progressive Populist, June 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the June 15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Hal Crowther 

Dark clouds gathering: homegrown fascists show their teeth

EDITORIAL 
Docs flee red states

FRANK LINGO 
Forest fires: Causes and solutions

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

DON ROLLINS 
Televangelism reconsidered

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Good words from a new king

DISPATCHES 
House GOP hellbent on tanking economy—one way or another. 
Progressives call for swift confirmation of Anna Gomez to FCC. 
Putin issues MAGA-approved sanction list. 
Rail workers union wins ‘trailblazing’ paid sick leave deal with Norfolk Southern. 
Big win for antitrust, as judge blocks JetBlue, American Airlines alliance. 
Wind and solar energy saved Texans $11B, but Republicans want to curb it ...


ART CULLEN 
Border crisis defies compromise

ALAN GUEBERT 
USDA 2023 forecasts: Colossal crops, measly prices and little backslapping


VERONICA AVILA and 
MARIA MONTGOMERY
Gig work is getting dangerous

JOHN YOUNG 
Pep rally for fascism on CNN

ELWOOD WATSON
Biden’s white supremacy comments hit the mark, and one republican senator


DICK POLMAN 
Trump says he’s ‘honored’ that his high court erased Roe v. Wade. But the abortion issue is his Achilles Heel. 

TOM CONWAY 
House Republicans mount personal attack on working people

ROBERT KUTTNER 
The budget farce: A travesty in two acts


DEAN BAKER 
Will Biden pull it out in the 14th? 

SAM PIZZIGATI 
To protect our children, tax the rich


DR. CINTLI 
Death, dying and honoring those we love: Part 1

GENE NICHOL 
The banner day in North Carolina

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas  
Nursing homes, or pricing grandma

SAM URETSKY 
Government can’t deliver to rural areas in frugal times

WAYNE O’LEARY 
Explaining America’s gun fetish

RICHARD D. WOLFF 
The debt ceiling debate is a massive deception against the public


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
American faces

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
Where eagles dare


LAURA PRITCHETT 
Guns have changed everything, especially childhood

KEN WINKES 
The fever wanes but never goes away

SETH SANDRONSKY 
Strike! Writers Guild of America west members stop work

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
Hollywood blacklist: ‘Cloak and Dagger’ and the Hollywood blacklist

From The Progressive Populist, June 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Friday, May 12, 2023

Editorial: Free the Debt Hostage

 Republican congressional leaders make it clear they intend to take the US over the financial cliff if President Joe Biden won’t agree to gut the economic recovery bills Democrats passed in the first two years of Biden’s administration, which pulled the economy out of Donald Trump’s COVID recession.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell joined 42 other Republican senators who signed a letter organized by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) May 6 declaring themselves in lockstep with House radicals who have pledged to stop any extension of the debt ceiling to pay bills the Trump administration incurred, unless Democrats first agrees to “substantive spending and budget reforms,” which include a 22% across-the-board cut in non-defense spending.

Those cuts, which House Republicans passed April 26, would include slashing health care, education, science, justice and labor. Republicans would include the Veterans Administration and veterans services in the cuts and force participants in Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to prove they meet a work-reporting requirement or qualify for an exemption. The Social Security Administration would have to close field offices and shorten operating hours, as well as lay off workers, which would mean delays in ruling on disability requests and processing retirement claims. 

Congressional Democrats say the cuts could mean losing 11,000 FBI agents, and 2,400 Border Patrol agents. The 4,468 new full-time positions for wildfire fighters would be cut by 1,754 jobs, and those who remain would have their pay cut. About 1,000 current firefighters could lose their jobs, and plans to increase their pay and improve working conditions would have to be scrapped.

Meanwhile, Republicans doubled down on protecting wealthy tax cheaters by including the first bill they passed after taking the House majority, Joan McCarter noted at Daily Kos. That bill rescinds the more than $70 billion in IRS funding included in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act to help the agency modernize and more effectively do its job. The Congressional Budget Office determined that the Republican bill actually adds to the deficit, finding it would cost the treasury more than $114 billion in the next decade.

All of these cuts, the White House notes, citing a Moody’s Analytics report, “would lead to 780,000 fewer jobs by the end of 2024 and would meaningfully increase the risk of recession.”

“Altogether, this legislation would not only risk default, recession, widespread job loss, and years of higher interest rates, but also make devastating cuts to programs that hard-working Americans and the middle-class count on,” the statement continues. “The bill would make it easier for wealthy tax cheats to avoid the taxes they owe, even as House Republicans are advancing other proposals that would spend trillions more on tax cuts skewed to the wealthy and big corporations, undoing much or all of the deficit reduction in this legislation.”

Senate Republicans hope the filibuster threat foils the attempt by House Democrats to force a vote on a clean debt ceiling increase with a “discharge petition,” if they got five Republican members to sign on, to give them a bare majority of 218 House members.

Even if Democrats forced the vote in the House and passed the debt ceiling increase on its own, Republicans could stop it in the Senate with a filibuster, which 41 senators could uphold.

That leaves Biden the option of declaring that Congress is failing in its constitutional duty to pay the debts it had incurred, so as president, he is constitutionally bound to uphold the clear directive of Section Four of the 14th Amendment, which states, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” 

Cornell Law School Professor Michael C. Dorf noted in the Boston Globe that the provision was added to the Constitution after the Civil War but, as the Supreme Court recognized in the 1935 case of Perry v. United States, “its language indicates a broader connotation.” Public debt, the court observed, extends beyond payments for costs the Union incurred fighting the Confederacy; it also extends beyond the bonds at issue in Perry, “embracing whatever concerns the integrity of the public obligations.”

Republicans hope to wreck the economy, as defaulting on the national debt would do, and blame it on Biden because they have no other hope of winning back the White House in 2024.

By most objective data, Biden has done a great job in restoring the crippled economy he inherited from Trump, who left office with a net loss of three million jobs and a 6.3% unemployment rate in January 2020, as well as inflated prices as supply lines were tangled during the COVID pandemic. 

Biden got the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act through Congress narrowly controlled by Democrats in March 2021. The bill provided $1,400 direct payments to individuals; extended unemployment benefits; expanded the child tax credit; and provided assistance for rent, mortgages, utilities and small businesses; a national vaccine program; and aid to state, local and tribal governments. 

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, signed into law Nov. 15, 2021, provided $1 trillion for roads and bridges, power infrastructure, passenger and freight rail, broadband, drinking water, western water storage, public transit, airports, water & soil purification, ports, electric vehicles and transportation safety programs.

The CHIPS and Science Act signed into law Aug. 9, 2022 provided $280 billion to help strengthen America’s manufacturing and technology capabilities, after a pandemic-related chip shortage disrupted auto production and drove up car prices and inflation.

The Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law Aug. 16, 2022, provided tax credits and rebates for renewable technologies, such as solar and wind-driven generators and electric vehicles. It also extends Affordable Care Act subsides by three years through 2025, which helped 7 million Americans get free health insurance.

Under Biden’s economic program, the US has gained 12.7 million jobs, including 253,000 in April, and the overall unemployment rate dropped to 3.4%, the lowest rate in a half-century. Black unemployment dropped to a record low 4.7%. Wage growth in April brought the annualized growth rate over the last three months to 4.2%. That’s relatively good news for workers, but the White House is frustrated that so many people feel the economy is in poor shape, when his record on jobs is unrivaled among presidencies since Lyndon Johnson. A CNN poll in March showed seven in 10 Americans rated the economy as somewhat or very poor and three in five expect the economy to be poor a year from now. And the Federal Reserve, determined to cool the economy to bring inflation down to 2%, increased benchmark interest rates to 5%.

So Republicans are determined to sabotage the recovery, and corporate media will continue to play down Biden’s accomplishments. Pundits will attack Biden for refusing to negotiate with the deadbeat Republicans. But he has the constitutional authority to pay the nation’s bills, and MAGA Republicans be damned. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, June 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Selections from the June 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/ProPublica

As rail profits soar, blocked crossings force kids to crawl under trains to get to school

EDITORIAL
Free the debt hostage


FRANK LINGO 
Biden’s power plants plan

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Biking in the car culture

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
It’s the Farm Bill season

DISPATCHES 
Doctors flee strict abortion ban in Idaho.
Choice supporters hope to put abortion on Florida ballot in 2024.
MAGA is on precipice. Young voters can push them off.
UAW holds off endorsing Biden in bid to ensure pro-worker EV transition.
Biden marks 200th mass shooting with another call for assault weapons ban ...


ART CULLEN 
Buying time for biofuels

ALAN GUEBERT
More greenhouse gas comes from rural leaders than rural America

SVANTE MYRICK 
Armed and afraid: The high price of fear

JOHN YOUNG 
GOP’s psychotic break with the future

DICK POLMAN
Republicans are drafting an ‘autopsy’ about their ‘22 election flops. Guess who they never mention? 


HANK KALET
Victory at Rutgers, but the fight continues


ROBERT KUTTNER 
Biden versus ‘Biden’

SONALI KOLHATKAR
The real reason Disney is defying DeSantis


THOM HARTMANN
America is being exhausted by the fear- and hate-mongers

DR. CINTLI 
A weekend with the US ex-president

DANIELLA PRIESHOFF 
Retire this dehumanizing language about immigrants

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas  
COVID capitalism segues into fraud

SAM URETSKY 
The more things quack

JOEL D. JOSEPH 
The Federal Reserve Board’s collateral damage

WAYNE O’LEARY
Democracy in jeopardy


JUAN COLE 
Lula is right that the UN Security Council can’t resolve major conflicts, whether Ukraine or Palestine

JASON SIBERT
Cooling Russia’s nuclear threat

SETH SANDRONSKY
Cold War 2.0: The military-industrial complex survives


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
Do do Don Ron run

GENE NICHOL 
Democracy resilient

RALPH NADER 
To tax the rich, we need ‘Scranton Joe’ of working people not ‘Delaware Joe’ of Wall Street


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
All Tuckered out


ROB PATTERSON 
Daisy Jones gets it

FARRAH HASSEN 
The artist who taught me about justice

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
‘The Wind & the Reckoning’

and more ...

From The Progressive Populist, June 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Saturday, April 29, 2023

Editorial: Fox ‘News’ Will Defame Again

 Many people expressed disappointment when news broke that Dominion Voting Systems had settled with Fox “News” on the day the long-anticipated defamation trial was supposed to start. 

Dominion executives decided to accept a $787.5 million check from Fox rather than go ahead with the trial and perhaps face years of appeals by Fox if a Delaware jury awarded the $1.6 billion in damages Dominion sought for the false claims Fox aired about the 2020 election being stolen with Dominion machines.

So Dominion took the money and walked away. Fox “News” lives to defame again. Fox was not required to apologize or admit wrongdoing, and even boasted, “This settlement reflects FOX’s continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards.”

But Dominion lawyers got the basic facts on the record, that Fox executives and on-air personalities knowingly broadcast claims about Democratic election fraud in the presidential balloting that they knew were nonsense. And we weren’t going to see courtroom video of Rupert Murdoch and his minions, such as Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and others, being cross-examined for their perfidy anyway, because the judge already had ruled that the trial would not be broadcast or recorded. And we know that, for many of the undecided, if there’s no video, it didn’t happen.

The judge ruled Dominion did prove that former President Donald Trump’s continued claims that the election was stolen were false. Dominion had the texts and messages from Fox executives and hosts showing they knew the conspiracy theories the channel aired were nonsense, but they chose to air them anyway to appeal to their audience, who believed the claims and wanted to believe Trump had won.

“Lies have consequences,” Dominion lawyer Justin Nelson said, adding: “Today represents a ringing endorsement for truth and for democracy.” If they’d gone to trial, Dominion’s lawyers would have to convince the jury that Fox’s actions met the legal standard of “actual malice,” which meant the broadcasters knew better, or that they showed a reckless disregard for the truth. Dominion had an exceptionally strong case. But Fox emerged with its “brand” intact of giving the rubes what they want to hear, rather than risk their viewers switching even further on the right wing, to Newsmax or One America News.

Settlement of the Dominion case may have defused an effort to test the First Amendment protections afforded to the media in reporting and commenting on public figures. But more challenges are likely against the nearly 60-year-old Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan, which set the “actual malice” standard, which public figures need to prove to win libel cases against the media. David Enrich of the New York Times noted that a founder of one of the law firms that represented Dominion is leading a campaign to get the Supreme Court to overturn its decision in Sullivan. 

“For decades, the Sullivan ruling was widely regarded as an essential safeguard that allowed journalists to aggressively cover public figures without fear that accidentally publishing an error — even a serious one — could expose them to devastating damages,” Enrich wrote.

“But over the past several years, with former President Donald J. Trump and other conservative leaders bashing the news media, that consensus has frayed.”

Justice Clarence Thomas in 2019 wrote that the Sullivan decision and some of the court’s subsequent rulings “were policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law” and should be overturned. (And that was long before ProPublica’s blockbuster reports in April on Thomas’ sweetheart deals with billionaire real estate developer Harlan Crow, and other gifts and business dealings Thomas failed to report.) Two years later, Justice Neil Gorsuch also signaled his openness to reconsidering Sullivan, which he said had “evolved into an ironclad subsidy for the publication of falsehoods by means and on a scale previously unimaginable.”

In recent court cases, Enrich noted, Republican politicians suing the news media for defamation — including former Senate candidates Don Blankenship and Roy Moore and former congressman Devin Nunes — have explicitly pushed judges to abandon the Sullivan ruling. And conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society have been convening public panels to discuss how the Sullivan ruling supposedly permits biased, vindictive journalists to defame their enemies with impunity.

Elizabeth M. Locke, a founding partner at Clare Locke, a defamation law firm that represented Dominion in its lawsuit against Fox “News,” has emerged as one of the most vocal advocates for overturning the Sullivan ruling.

“It’s virtually impossible to bring and win one of these cases,” Locke said earlier this year. The media “have complete immunity from liability.” (In fact, Enrich noted, Locke’s law firm and others have recently secured multimillion-dollar jury verdicts for public figures suing the media for defamation.)

Locke spoke at a televised event that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted to build support for reversing Sullivan.

DeSantis has pushed the Florida Legislature to curtail legal protections for the media, which some experts regard as an attempt to trigger litigation that would give the Supreme Court an opportunity to reconsider Sullivan.

But Rodney A. Smolla, another lawyer representing Dominion alongside Locke’s firm, said the Dominion case shows plaintiffs can win under the actual malice standard, as long as judges allow plaintiffs to engage in discovery. “This takes some of the oxygen out of that argument” that libel cases are unwinnable, he said.

The impact of Dominion’s lawsuit was always going to be limited because of Fox’s ultimate weapon: cable carriage fees, Media Matters for America President Angelo Carusone noted.

“The dirty secret about Fox News is that it is one of the only commercial TV channels that doesn’t need a single advertisement to be profitable, if not the only one. In fact, Fox could have zero dollars in ad revenue and still have at least a 35% profit margin. This is the result of carriage fees and the guaranteed revenue they provide Fox,” Carusone wrote at MSNBC.com April 20.

Fox News is gearing up to renew contracts with major cable providers worth more than $1.6 billion annually to Fox at current rates. And Fox is seeking an increase in the rates from the current average of about $20 per year to $36. So cable subscribers will pay for Fox News’ settlement, even if they don’t watch Fox News. (See UnFoxMyCableBox.com.) “With the Dominion lawsuit settled, Fox will now put all of its energy into these carriage renewals,” Carusone wrote.

Next up is Smartmatic, another voting tech company that was often lumped in with Dominion while Fox was making the false claims. A New York judge in March allowed Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion lawsuit to proceed. And Smartmatic’s lawyer said he won’t settle for less than a retraction, and the $787 million Dominion got. So we’ll probably end up paying for that, too. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, May 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist