Friday, October 30, 2020

Editorial: Finish Strong for Freedom

Donald Trump may have been as surprised as anyone when he won the 2016 presidential election. He got 46.1% of the vote, finishing second in the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, who got 48.2%, 2.8 million ahead of the reality TV star. But because of the peculiarities of the Electoral College, Trump’s narrow victories in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by a margin of less than 80,000 votes across those three states put him in the White House. 

No sooner was Trump inaugurated than he started his re-election campaign. But he never tried to win over the people who voted for Clinton, instead writing them off as enemies. He campaigned on a populist platform of protecting American jobs, but he ruled as an autocrat. More than 300,000 American manufacturing jobs were lost during Trump’s presidency, as his trade war alienated our allies, China found new sources for commodities such as pork and soybeans and the trade deficit increased 22% since 2016. 

Meanwhile, Trump loaded his Cabinet with corporate lobbyists who cut regulations and threatened worker safety and public health. He passed a tax cut that mainly benefitted billionaires and corporations, but also created a new tax incentive to offshore jobs. His lackeys sabotaged the US Postal Service. He proposes to defund Social Security and Medicare if re-elected. Of course, he has shown himself incapable of controlling the coronavirus — even in the White House.

Trump’s approval since his inauguration peaked at 45.8% in April, in the FiveThirtyEight average of polls, while disapproval has mostly stayed above 50% since a few weeks after his inauguration. 

We certainly aren’t going to call the election in advance, after what happened in 2016, but we are guardedly optimistic. Joe Biden, who would repeal those tax cuts for corporations and individuals making more than $400,000 a year, is leading Trump in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Biden also is narrowly ahead in Arizona, Florida, North Carolina and even in Texas. And early voting is at record levels, with nearly 60 million casting their ballots as of Oct. 25, suggesting a surge of support for Democrats. But it will take a strong finish to crush the Great Misleader by a margin that makes it impossible for Republicans to steal the election. 

Democrats need to flip at least three Senate seats to regain the majority. Dem challengers are leading in Arizona, Colorado and Maine and are in tossups for two Georgia seats, Iowa, Montana, North Carolina and South Carolina. Democrats also making strong races in Alaska, Kansas and Texas. On defense, Gary Peters faces a tough re-election race in Michigan and Doug Jones faces a tougher race in Alabama. 

Biden says he wants to work with both parties in the next Congress, but former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid advised his longtime Senate colleague to take “no more than three weeks” to test bipartisanship before moving to end the filibuster, so Democrats can overcome Republican obstruction. In an interview with the Associated Press, Reid said there is just too much that needs to be done in the country to wait around trying to reach agreements under the decades-old Senate practice of requiring 60 votes to advance legislation.

When he was majority leader, Reid was forced to end the filibuster on administrative and most judicial nominees in November 2013 after then-Minority Leader Mitch McConnell used the filibuster to block virtually all of President Obama’s executive and court appointees. Democrats still kept the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees, as well as legislation. When Republicans gained the majority in 2015, McConnell resumed blocking Obama’s court appointees, including seven appeals court vacancies and 42 district court vacancies. 

In the most notorious case, after Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016, McConnell refused to allow the Senate to consider Obama’s choice of Merrick Garland, Chief Judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, in March 2016 to replace Scalia on the Supreme Court. McConnell argued that a Supreme Court nominee should not be considered during an election year. 

Republican senators never gave Garland a hearing and threatened to keep the Supreme Court seat open through a Hillary Clinton administration, if necessary. That threat became moot when Trump was elected, but McConnell further greased the skids by eliminating the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees, allowing the Republican Senate majority to barrel over Democratic opposition to confirm Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. 

In his first debate with Biden, Trump said it was Obama’s and Biden’s fault that he was able to name so many judges. “I’ll have so many judges because President Obama and [Biden] left me 128 judges to fill,” he said Sept. 29. “You just don’t do that.” (The actual number of judicial vacancies he inherited was 105, PolitiFact noted. Many of those occurred too late to be filled by Obama, even if the Republicans hadn’t been blocking them.)

Republicans blew off their claimed principled opposition to filling a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died Sept. 18. On Sept. 26, Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, who was finishing her third year on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Her nomination was rushed through the Judiciary Committee. 

During four days of hearings, Barrett evaded answering Democrats’ questions about her positions on issues that might come before the court. Then Republicans changed the rules on the Judiciary Committee to approve Barrett’s nomination with no Democrats present for the vote. Senate Republicans voted 51-49 to cut off debate Oct. 25. The next day they confirmed Barrett Oct. 26 with a 52-48 vote, followed by her swearing in at the White House. 

Meanwhile, McConnell still has not found enough time on the Senate agenda to consider bills for coronavirus relief, despite bills that have been on his desk since May. The House bills would provide relief for people who have lost jobs during the economic collapse, as well as money for local and state governments that have lost revenue and face the prospect of laying off essential workers, stimulus checks for families and money to pay for COVID-19 tests and contact tracing. 

Supporters of the filibuster say it encourages bipartisan consensus by requiring bill sponsors to get at least 60 senators to allow the legislation to proceed. However, the filibuster was instituted in the early 20th century to let conservative senators thwart popular initiatives.

Barack Obama has endorsed the effort for change. During the funeral this year for Rep. John Lewis, Obama announced his support for ending the filibuster, calling it a Jim Crow-era relic that was used to stall voting advances for Black people.

Of course, there is a risk in doing away with the filibuster, since Republicans could do a lot of damage if they got control of the White House and both chambers of Congress again, but that means people must get out to vote regularly to promote and keep senators who support the public good. 

Under Trump, Republicans have packed the courts with partisan right-wing hacks at every level. Biden, resisting efforts to draw him into endorsing the expansion of the Supreme Court, has proposed a bipartisan commission to study reform of the federal judiciary. 

Biden also has resisted calls to expand Medicare to cover everybody, preferring to improve the ACA, but he supports lowering the Medicare eligibility age to 60. If, as expected, the radicalized Supreme Court invalidates the Affordable Care Act, Democrats should replace it with Medicare for All that covers all medical expenses, as the Canadian system does. Biden can explain that the Supreme Court made him do it. (Biden can also blame the greedy insurance companies. If they don’t like working under Obamacare rules, let’s see how they like losing the market entirely.) — JMC.

From The Progressive Populist, November 15, 2020


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist

PO Box 819, Manchaca TX 78652


Selections from the November 15, 2020 issue

 COVER/Lisa Song and Lylla Younes, ProPublica 

The EPA refuses to reduce pollutants linked to coronavirus deaths

EDITORIAL
Finish strong for freedom


NORMAN SOLOMON
Why a former Green Party candidate is on a very long fast — urging progressives to vote for Biden to defeat Trump

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
Nukes: The devil that never left

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Save family farms, because Wall Street won’t

DISPATCHES 
Trump can’t change subject from COVID-19. 
COVID cases surge after Trump ‘superspreader’ rallies. 
Trump plans post-election purge. 
Trump still has no health care plan. 
Trump tops 22,000 lies as prez, but Washington Post can’t keep up. 
Early voting encourages Dems. 
Lincoln Project rejects threat.
Trump targets civil service.
Secret Chinese bank account remains problem for Trump.
Poll: Pennsylvanians support clean energy ...


ART CULLEN 
A cure for the wintertime blues

SARAH ANDERSON
Farmers and meatpackers are teaming up


JILL RICHARDSON 
Voter suppression in a pandemic election

JOHN YOUNG 
Your take on Trump now, corruption lady


TOM CONWAY 
Hanging by a thread

JOHN GEYMAN 
Trump’s fantasy about COVID-19 keeps killing Americans. What can be done?


ROBERTO Dr. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ  
Foundational lies & foundational myths: Or the ‘genius’ of the ‘Founding Fathers’

RICHARD D. WOLFF 
How fascism has converged with capitalism to redefine government


ANDREW MOSS
Preparing for a contested election

SAM PIZZIGATI  
Biden’s tax plan would make America more equal

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas  
The Great Barrington Declaration meets Eugenics

SAM URETSKY 
Infrastructure week put off again

JOHN L. MICEK
Democrats keep healthcare front and center

WAYNE O’LEARY 
Myth of the great Trump economy

JOHN BUELL 
Negotiations amidst an emerging evictions crisis

SATIRE/Frank Lingo 
Trump’s legacy


JOEL D. JOSEPH 
Barrett should not get that promotion


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel  
Truth vs. journalism? Spotting a hoax?

ROB PATTERSON 
Jane Fonda still trends left

SETH SANDRONSKY 
Filming movement politics

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson  
Mother knows best

MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell
‘Totally Out of Control’ chronicles COVID ‘response’ a.k.a. Trump’s genocidal negligent homicide of the American people

GENE NICHOL 
Losing heroes

and more ...

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Zuzu’s Petals or Pottersville — The Choice is Ours

By ROBIN STREICHLER


Kelly Stewart Harcourt’s Aug. 27 letter to the NYT Editor calls out the hypocrisy of an RNC speaker, Natalie Harp, comparing Trump to the character George Bailey whom Harcourt’s father played in the film, It’s a Wonderful Life. In her letter she wrote, “Given that this beloved classic is about decency, compassion, sacrifice and a fight against corruption, our family considers Ms. Harp’s analogy to be the height of hypocrisy and dishonesty.”


It is my belief this beloved 1946 American classic film has such amazing longevity because of its powerful message — that George Bailey’s life made a difference. The film shows us that if George Bailey had never been born, many lives would have been shattered and destroyed without his beneficence to uplift them, and the lovely small town of Bedford Falls would have devolved into the corrupt “Pottersville,” aptly named for the town’s most greedy and exploitative resident, Henry F. Potter.


What we may too easily overlook in this film is that in George Bailey’s absence, the town of Bedford Falls was easily taken over by Potter’s corrupt agenda. “How did that happen?” I asked myself. Why did the entire town go down the tubes in the absence of one man? And why was Potter unable to exert his evil influence over the town when George Bailey lived? These are the questions before each of us right now as we do our own soul searching regarding our own participation in our communities and elections.


I invite you to consider that there will always be Potters in the world. But, that is not why communities and societies turn dark and corrupt. The reason Bedford Falls deteriorated into Pottersville was that there were apparently no other “George Baileys” in the town to stop it. All the other people in that town allowed Potter’s corrupt ways to overcome its light and goodness. I am reminded of the quote attributed to the 18th Century Philosopher, Edmund Burke, which in essence states that all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.


Make no mistake, our country could be turning into one giant Pottersville before our eyes. Yet, each of us has the power to step into our own inner George Bailey and know that we are not powerless over the corruption and the decay of compassion in our society — that we do not have to turn a blind eye to all the modern-day “Potters” in our world who would do us harm while feeding their own power and pockets.


Like George, each of us can care for each other and our communities with generosity, participate in politics and raise our voices. Each of our lives can make a difference like George Bailey’s life made a difference, touching countless other lives. I believe that the real message of this film is one that can inspire each of us to show up to hold ourselves, our communities and country to the standards Ms. Stewart Harcourt so eloquently identified as “decency, compassion, sacrifice and a fight against corruption.”


Robin Streichler is a Los Angeles writer, editorial cartoonist and environmental health advocate. This originally appeared on Medium. See the original at <https://link.medium.com/N3ygGzLMT9> 




A Satirical Look at the Requirements for POTUS

With the presidential election in full swing, it might be time to reconsider the constitutional requirements for becoming president. The founding fathers thought that if you were a natural-born citizen of the United States, a US resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older, you might possess the intelligence, judgment and disposition to become president of the United States. On first thought, it might be reasonable. We would have ample opportunity to evaluate the candidates. We could listen to their speeches, review their past behavior, and make an intelligent decision about which of the candidates would become the best president. And if indeed we made a mistake, the founding fathers gave us the opportunity to correct our mistake by offering us the option of impeachment. Well, maybe not the most effective option.

However, upon reflection, there are many requirements we could impose, but there is one additional requirement that might just be sufficient. Did the candidates pass kindergarten? Not just attended kindergarten, but did they pass or fail? Why is this important? Well, some years ago, Robert Fulghum wrote a book about the importance of kindergarten—“All I Really Need to Know I learned in Kindergarten.” And what were some of those things? “Play fair,” “Don’t hit people,” “Ignorance and power and pride are a deadly mixture, you know,” “It doesn’t matter what you say you believe—it only matters what you do,” and much more.


Do you remember some things you learned in kindergarten? For example: Don’t lie, don’t be a bully, don’t call people nasty names based on their appearance or make fun of their disabilities. Of course, not all of our kindergartners need these lessons, but we know that some of them do. That is why kindergartners and even older children need “adults in the room.” Of course, our kindergarten teachers try to help us learn these things, but sometimes it doesn’t work. What can the teachers do? Well, they might not be able to change the child’s behavior, but they can write FAIL on the report card. Forever — on a permanent record.


And if an amendment to the constitution is adopted that requires passing kindergarten in order to run for president, any parent who would like to see their child advance to the highest office in the land would most certainly make sure to save those records noting that their child did indeed pass kindergarten.


OK, so it’s a pipe dream, but even if no such amendment is ever passed and we know it won’t be, it might be something to think about when we cast our vote for president of the United States of America.


RFS - Retired Educator, San Diego, CA