Jane Mayer’s Dark Money does a thorough job of dissecting the 40-year campaign of a small coterie of billionaires to change the American political agenda for their own selfish ends. She explains the process by which our country has reached the point at which it is overwhelmingly centrist-looking-left but controlled by right-wingers, especially at the state level. It explains how the Democrats could outvote the Republicans by millions and still not have a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives. It explains why the mass media focuses on inessential issues such as the deficit or promulgates ridiculous myths such as the social value of lowering taxes and the idea that science is unsure about global warming.
The ultimate reason for the current state of American
politics and public life is money. In this case, money spent over the past 30+
years by a small number of billionaires who wanted to lower their taxes and end
regulation that cost their businesses money. The main organizers of this group have
been Charles and David Koch, two of four sons of industrialist and rightwing
funder Fred Koch, an original founder of the John Birch Society.
These rich folk have included among others Richard Mellon Scaife,
the DeVos, Bradley and Olin families, Phillip Anschutz, Peter Singer and Sheldon
Adelson, but most of the organizing has come from Charles Koch.
According to Mayer, their long-term game plan, hatched in
the mid-70s, came partly from a memo by Lewis Powell before he joined the
Supreme Court and a white paper put together by William Simon after he was
Secretary of the Treasury. It started with secretly starting and financing
think tanks that churn out position papers supporting their rightwing political
views, e.g. government is always bad, the free market solves all problems, a minimum
wage leads to unemployment, unions constitute restraint of trade, taxes should
be lowered on job creators—the entire package of lies still peddled by
Republican candidates, Fox News, the Wall
Street Journal and a horde of think tanks. They also invaded the
universities, feeding them with money to study economic, political and social
phenomena from a rightwing perspective. Mayer does an especially good job of
showing how Koch money has turned George Mason University into a center of
phony rightwing research. One of the more successful think tanks has been the
American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the organization that writes all
the anti-union, voter suppression, gun rights and shaft-the-poor legislation
that Republican legislators have passed in recent years.
For years Koch has held secret seminars for his billionaire
pals in which he outlined issues, discussed strategies and shared information
on how to establish layers of nonprofit organizations to hide the names of
donors and how much they have given.
From the think tanks, rightwing ideas spread to the general
public through the news media, especially the rightwing media which used to
consist of a few hundred radio stations but now includes the vast Fox
broadcasting empire. At a certain point, the Kochtapus—a description of the
Koch network of fellow billionaire contributors—began to invest millions in
supporting specific candidates. After Citizen’s
United, the ultraright ratcheted up candidate investment. Along the way,
they found it easier to control local and statewide elections than national
ones.
The 30 or so rich individuals or families Mayer mentions as
part of the Dark Money network fall into one of three categories:
1.
Their business interests have depended either
primarily or substantially on government contracts, which explains why the
ultraright hates government but loves military contracts and subsidies for oil
and gas.
2.
Owners of companies that have gotten into
trouble for not following environmental, financial or other regulations and owe
or have paid the government a ton of money or are involved in litigation with
the government.
3.
People who are both, which include the Koch
brothers who are the closest people to being pure evil as I have ever
encountered in reading or real life.
In other words, these billionaires will often wrap
themselves in a flag and say they are trying to preserve and enhance our
freedom, but their desire is to create a government that bows to their selfish
interests. For all of the billionaires, the only thing that matters is money
and power, but others are motivated by their religiosity, racism or love of
guns, which partially explains the alliance these plutocrats have made with the
religious right and the gun lobby.
While Mayer does an excellent job of shedding light on all
of this dark money, she doesn’t put the experience of the last 40 years of
rightwing insurgency financed by a handful of the ultra wealthy into the
context of U.S. history. Around the time of Simon’s call to action, which was
general, the progressive sociologist William Domhoff laid out in great detail how
to control American policy decisions in his public policy model. Domhoff constructed
a complicated flow chart that describes in advance exactly what the Kochtapus
did: Start by controlling research and universities, then public policy, and
finally legislation and legislators. Domhoff is illuminating a process that has
controlled American policy since at least the turn of the 20th century. The
controlling interests have always been the ultra wealthy and have always
skewered to the right. What differs with the current bunch of oligarchs is the
vastly larger sums of money involved, that they have concealed so much of their
activity behind multiple layers of organizations and that so much of the ruling
elite has turned its back on the compromises made with the New Deal.
Mayer doesn’t mention it, but I believe that the massive tax
break that Reagan pushed through Congress early in his first term has led to
the great increase in the money that these billionaires have contributed to
controlling the American political process. The tax cut both freed up more
money for them to throw around and by making them richer, gave them more
incentive to fight against social welfare programs and for lower taxes. I
believe Thomas Piketty made a similar argument in Capitalism in the 21st Century as to why incomes for chief
executive officers skyrocketed after the Regan tax breaks.
Dark Money is a
depressing book, but one I recommend that everyone who cares about the future
direction of our country read.
How do we fight the forces of Dark Money? To my mind, progressives,
liberals and centrists must vote for the Democratic candidate this year, no
matter who it is, and more important, to vote Democrat in every off-year
election. A mildly progressive president won in 2008 and 20012, but his victory
was neutralized to a large degree because of the election of 2010, which
determined who was going to set the boundaries of Congressional districts.
Like Obama and Hillary Clinton, most Democrats tend to be extremely progressive on domestic issues and hawkish on
foreign policy issues, but much less so than the Republicans. The loud cry of
people like Elizabeth Warren drives the more mainstream Democrats even further
left. Voting for Democrats, but driving the party further left is the only way
we can stop the United States from becoming a land of rich and poor with fake
elections controlled by a handful of selfish and very wealthy people.
