Sunday, October 1, 2023

Selections from the October 15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Reynard Loki 

Why Healthy forests mean fewer pandemics

EDITORIAL 
Labor shows its grit


FRANK LINGO
Eco-activists are getting murdered

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

DON ROLLINS 
Bill Richardson: A study in nuance

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Save the earth before it’s too late

DISPATCHES 
NLRB’s recent decisions are good news for workers.
Texas Senate ‘acquits’ impeached atttorney general; Republicans seek state House Speaker’s removal for pushing impeachment.
Rupert Murdoch’s legacy is a stain on psychic life of America.
News flash for Republican hardliners: Shutdowns cost billions ...

ART CULLEN 
Storm Lake gets sucked dry so the world gets cheap meat

ALAN GUEBERT 
The pile-ups start to pile up


LAKEISHA MCVEY 
Poverty just jumped — and it was no accident

JOHN YOUNG 
Another big GOP lie: ‘Economy’s a wreck’

JAZMIN OROZCO RODRIGUEZ  
How will rural Americans fare during Medicaid unwinding? Experts fear they’re on their own

DICK POLMAN 
“Impeaching” Biden for non-existent high crimes is the latest manifestation of MAGA madness

SAM PIZZIGATI 
UAW strike gives us new hope for the working class

TOM H. HASTINGS
Shutdown showdown

TOM CONWAY 
Empowering the caregivers

RYAN GABRIELSON 
Wall Street bet big on used-car loans for years. Now a crisis may be looming. 


ROBERT KUTTNER 
Labor’s militant creativity

MARJORIE KELLY
End wealth supremacy

THOM HARTMANN  
Can we stop the GOP’s Big Pharma rip-off?


SONALI KOLHATKAR  
Will billionaires build a new utopian city — to replace what they ruined? 


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet  
Surfing the strike wave

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Abortion and the myopia of states’ rights’ enthusiasts

SAM URETSKY 
Houses for the homeless

SVANTE MYRICK
Bogus ‘edutainment’ may be coming to a classroom near you

WAYNE O’LEARY 
No labels, no sense

LEW KINGSBURY 
Scorched earth, wildfires, and raging floods ... is geoengineering our climate the answer?

JUAN COLE
Libya’s climate disaster shows we can’t afford erratic leaders like Trump and Haftar any more

RICHARD D. WOLFF 
Economic growth in G7 versus BRICS: A reality check


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
It’s the cream cheese, stupid

LINDSAY KOSHGARIAN and ALLIYAH LUSUEGRO 
Climate is the fight of our lifetime. Our federal budget should reflect that. 

RALPH NADER 
Corporate criminal behavior almost exposé proof


DENNIS HINKAMP
Report from Burning Man 2023

ROB PATTERSON 
The worst wages of fame

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
It’s Bayer, not Burisma, dummy

ED RAMPELL  
Assuring Black is Beautiful and visible in the fashion industry 

From The Progressive Populist, October 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Friday, September 15, 2023

SCOTUS Money

 

With so many Republican justices on the US Supreme Court having accepted money and gifts from wealthy donors with business in front of the court, it’s unacceptable that they’ve not been held more accountable. 

For more Graphics and Greeting Cards, go to https://kkreneck.wixsite.com/mysite



Editorial: Give Bidenomics Credit

 Republicans plan to sabotage the economy with the expectation that voters will blame Joe Biden for the government shutdown the extremists plan to force Oct. 1 in their demand for deep cuts in federal spending.

Right-wing Republican “Freedom Caucus” members are demanding cuts that go far deeper than what President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy agreed to in May when Congress suspended the debt ceiling. Facing a right-wing revolt by Republicans who rarely support spending bills at all, McCarthy has agreed to allocations for the 12 annual spending bills at lower levels than the $1.59 trillion allowed in the debt ceiling deal.

In the last month of the fiscal year, Congress has not cleared any of its 12 annual appropriations bills. A temporary stopgap funding measure might avert a government shutdown beginning Oct. 1. But the far-right Freedom Caucus members are pledging to oppose a temporary measure if it does not cut funding substantially or include new border controls and restrictions on prosecuting disgraced former President Donald J. Trump. At the same time, senators of both parties want the stopgap bill to include billions of dollars in new assistance to Ukraine, a demand that House Republicans are resisting, along with funds to replenish federal disaster relief. 

In the Senate, Democrats and Republicans have been working to advance spending bills and keep them free of contentious policy riders that are drawing fire in the House.

In the first two years of his administration, Biden had a narrowly Democratic Congress, with a majority of 8 to 12 votes in the House for most of the session and a 50-50 Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris providing the tie-breaking vote, as long as center-right senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema remained in the fold. With that, Democrats passed the American Rescue Plan (ARP), which provided a $1.9 trillion boost to the economy. This funded a relatively quick recovery, in contrast to the slow painful road back to full employment following the Great Recession brought on by the George W. Bush administration.

Biden also got an infrastructure bill, passed with a bipartisan majority, which not only addresses long-neglected infrastructure needs across the country; it also includes funds to support a green transition, by modernizing the country’s power grid and setting up a system of charging stations for electric cars. He also got the CHIPS Act, which appropriated $280 billion over the next five years (approximately 1% of the federal budget) for research and support for manufacturing advanced semiconductors in the US.

Then Biden got the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed on a strictly partisan basis. Biden somehow managed to get the support of Manchin on that bill, which is jump-starting a green transition.

The IRA includes large subsidies for clean energy and electric cars. As a result, in the relatively short time since its passage, we have seen an explosion in plans for factories producing electric cars and batteries, as well as wind and solar power. And it also authorized Medicare to start negotiating lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies, over oppositiion of Big Pharma and Republicans.

The unemployment rate, which stood at 6.3% when Biden took office, had fallen to 3.9% by the end of 2021, and has not gone over 4% since then. It dropped to 3.5% in July, but rose to 3.8% in August, driven by an extraordinary 736,000 one-month rise in the size of the labor force. It is still the longest period where the unemployment rate has been below 4% in more than half a century, economist Dean Baker noted, as employment is up by more than 2.8 million over the last year. “As a result of the ARP, the United States is the only major economy that is largely back to its pre-pandemic growth path. The US also now has the lowest inflation rate of any of the G-7 economies,” Baker wrote.

Yet Biden gets little credit for the economic rebound from the COVID lockdown. As Paul Krugman noted in the New York Times Sept. 7, “Poll after poll shows Americans rating economic conditions as very bad and giving Biden very low approval for his economic management.

“The strange thing is that these bad ratings are persisting even as the economy, by any normal measure, has been doing extremely well. Indeed, we’ve just experienced what Goldman Sachs is calling the ‘soft landing summer.’ Inflation is down by almost two-thirds since its peak in June 2022, and this has happened without the recession and huge job losses many economists insisted would be necessary. Real wages, especially for nonsupervisory workers, are significantly higher than they were before the pandemic.”

Krugman also noted that, despite the low poll ratings for Biden’s handing of the economy, “There’s substantial evidence that people don’t feel that they personally are doing badly. Both surveys and consumer behavior suggest, on the contrary, that while most Americans feel that they’re doing OK, they believe that the economy is doing badly, where “the economy” presumably means other people.”

The Federal Reserve conducts an annual survey of economic well-being of households, and at the end of 2022, 73% of households said that they were “at least doing OK financially,” down from the previous year (presumably because of the end of many pandemic aid programs) but not significantly below the number in 2019. In 2019, however, half the population said that the national economy was good or excellent; in 2022 that number dropped to 18%.

Republicans blamed Biden for high gas prices in the summer of 2022, when the national average gas price topped $5 a gallon in June after Russia invaded Ukraine. Biden asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate possible illegal conduct by large oil companies in the national gasoline market, he released oil from strategic reserves and he urged oil producers to ramp up supply even as he urged the US and other countries to wean themselves from fossil fuels over the long term to avert catastrophic global warming.

Gas prices dropped below $4 in August 2022 but OPEC+, led by Russia and Saudi Arabia, in October 2022 announced a production cut of 2 million barrels a day, in what was seen as an effort to drive up gas prices before the US midterm election. Biden also threatened to seek a new windfall profits tax on major oil and gas companies unless they ramp up production to curb the price of gasoline at the pump, an escalation of his battle with the energy industry just a week before the midterm elections.

Senate Budget Chair Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) sponsored the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax bill to curb profiteering by the five largest oil companies that produce 30% of the nation’s oil and hauled in pre-tax profits totaling $264.3 billion in 2022, when gas prices briefly surpassed $5 a gallon. Revenue raised from the windfall profits of big oil companies would be returned to consumers in the form of a quarterly rebate. But voters put Republicans in narrow control of the House, and gas prices are rising again.

Democrats should make profiteering an issue in 2024 and force Republicans to defend oil companies and monopolists. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, October 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the October 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/Elisabeth Rosenthal 

Why are your medical bills so high? Look as your latest hospital merger 

EDITORIAL 
Give Bidenomics credit

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
Project 2025: A coup by another name

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Hog and chicken ‘farms’ might move into the city

DISPATCHES 
Rep. Jamie Raskin blows up Republican lies about alleged Biden corruption.
Can Senate Republicans stop House extremists from helping Putin?
Biden’s signature economic policy is paying off.
Why Republicans want to defund IRS.
Red state profs are eyeing the exits as Republican lawmakers get involved in higher education..


ART CULLEN 
Truth: Mexicans don’t set your pay. They scoop corn. 

ALAN GUEBERT 
New, long overdue efforts to reform federal commodity checkoffs

OLIVIA ALPERSTEIN
A crossroads for workers with disabilities

JOHN YOUNG 
Racist designs of the Big Lie players

BRAM SABLE-SMITH 
Funyuns and flu shots? Gas station company ventures into urgent care 

DICK POLMAN 
Nikki Haley’s shameless fascist-adjacent flip flops


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
His very nature

TOM CONWAY 
The power of a first contract

TOM GALLAGHER 
Whatever happened to American populism?


ROBERT KUTTNER 
The economy: Steady as she goes

FELIX ALLEN  
Don’t blame workers for poor service — blame our CEOs

THOM HARTMANN  
Housing: How do we protect one of the primary essentials of life? 

SONALI KOLHATKAR  
Making sense of Florida’s nonsensical history curriculum


SETH SANDRONSKY 
In California, corporate interests fight housing solutions

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
States as countinghouses

SAM URETSKY 
Misinformation on COVID abounds

MARK ANDERSON 
Fixing the economy

WAYNE O’LEARY
Greedonomics at the supermarket

SAM PIZZIGATI 
The lost art (and joy) of taxing the rich


N. GUNASEKARAN
Israeli judicial reform and decline of democracies in Asia

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN
Trump isn’t too big to jail


BARRY FRIEDMAN
De Mortuis Nil Nisi Bonum

FRANK LINGO
My electric car adventure

RALPH NADER
Mass media: Stop being a Trump megaphone and cover civic critics rebutting him


MARJORIE “SLIM” WOODRUFF
There’s such a thing as trail etiquette

ROB PATTERSON 
Sorrow for Bruce Willis, the best bartender that ever served me

ED RAMPELL  
Remembering Chile’s coup on film 

From The Progressive Populist, October 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Airhead Tuberville

 

Senator Tom Tuberville no longer lives in the state he represents. He’s been accused of insider trading and his hold on military promotions stopped being amusing a long, long time ago. Now, many consider his actions a threat to national security. 

For more Graphics and Greeting Cards, go to https://kkreneck.wixsite.com/mysite


Saturday, August 26, 2023

Editorial: Crime & Punishment, Eventually

 Donald Trump got 13 new felonies added to his rap sheet Aug. 14, when a grand jury in Atlanta indicted Trump on charges of conspiring with at least 18 other co-defendants in an attempt to fraudulently overturn election results, in a Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. 

The RICO indictment brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis increased the total number of felonies Trump faces to 91 so far, but federal special counsel Jack Smith reportedly is still bringing witnesses to testify before a grand jury in D.C., which might bring more charges against the disgraced ex-president. 

As the Trump felony count approaches triple figures, he also faces civil lawsuits for business fraud, rape and defamation, as well as damages for violence inflicted upon law enforcement officers by Trump supporters who believed they were following his orders in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. 

Mainstream pundits are starting to join Republican partisans in suggesting state and federal prosecutors are piling on the former president in unprecedented fashion. They’re playing down the prospects of actually putting Trump in jail, but so far the indictments have put forward strong cases against Trump on scores of serious charges. 

The day after the Georgia indictment, Trump reacted with his usual bluster, announcing he had “a large, complex, detailed but irrefutable report on the presidential election fraud which took place in Georgia” that he would present a week later, which he insisted would result in “complete exoneration.” 

But two days later, Trump posted a statement on his social media site that “Rather than releasing the Report on the Rigged & Stolen Georgia 2020 Presidential Election on Monday [Aug. 21], my lawyers would prefer putting this, I believe, Irrefutable & Overwhelming evidence of Election Fraud & Irregularities in formal Legal Filings as we fight to dismiss this disgraceful Indictment … Therefore, the News Conference is no longer necessary!” 

Of course, neither Trump nor his lawyers have been able to show credible evidence of fraud or irregularities, and now the criminal defendant is desperate to delay the trials until after the 2024 election, hoping he can win back the White House and pardon himself of the federal crimes. Jack Smith proposed a Jan. 2, 2024, start for the trial in D.C. on the federal charges from Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election, but Trump’s attorneys countered with an April 2026 trial date — close to a year and a half after the 2024 presidential election. And Republican leaders appear complicit in the grifter’s efforts to, once again, duck accountability. 

Fulton County DA Willis is seeking a March 2 start for the trial, but the RICO case is complicated, as she will weave 161 acts detailed in the 98-page indictment, many of which are not criminal acts on their own but promote the criminal enterprise, into violation of the Georgia RICO Act. And efforts to pressure election officials or secure fake electors in other states can be brought into the case because they promote the purpose of the criminal enterprise, which was, as the indictment states, to “unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump.”

As Mark Sumner noted at Daily Kos Aug. 15, the Georgia indictment may be a much larger case than the federal indictments brought by Smith. “The case is broader in terms of the evidence to be heard, wider in the sense of the number of crimes to be considered, and deeper in that it travels the pyramid of the criminal enterprise from the orange peak down to state and local Trump allies at the base.”

The Georgia RICO law also carries a sentence of five to 20 years, which cannot be pardoned until after the sentence is served. 

Trump also faces federal felony charges for refusing to return classified documents and obstructing investigations of the missing documents, with his aide Waltine Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira as co-defendants. They’ve all pleaded not guilty in the case, which is expected to go to trial in mid-2024 in Judge Aileen Cannon’s court, but might be delayed until after the election.

Trump also faces state felony charges in Manhattan, where a grand jury in March voted with District Attorney Alvin Bragg on the first indictment of a former president, in a case involving 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to violate campaign finance laws in connection with a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet before the 2016 election. 

Meanwhile, New York Attorney General Letitia James is ready to go to trial in October in the civil lawsuit against Trump, sons Don Jr. and Eric, the Trump Organization and others who she says repeatedly committed fraud between 2011 and 2021, by inflating Trump’s net worth and overvaluing properties in order to deceive banks and lenders. James also alleges that Trump also undervalued his properties’ value when filing his tax returns.

James is seeking at least $250 million in damages.

The judge in that case, Arthur Engoron, has said the Oct. 2 trial date is “set in stone,” and he has rejected requests by Trump’s lawyers for delays.

James also has turned over her findings to federal prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service, which could result in more criminal charges against Trump.

E. Jean Carroll, who was awarded $5 million for battery and defamation on May 9 after a Manhattan federal jury found Trump had sexually abused Carroll in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s, will return to federal court in Manhattan Jan. 15 for trial of a second defamation lawsuit seeking another $10 million from Trump, who said during the CNN “Town Hall on May 10, “I have no idea who this woman [is] … this is a fake story, made-up story.” He also called Carroll a “whack job,” because, as Charles Jay noted at Daily Kos, “Trump just can’t control himself.”

Of course, we are obligated to remind you that Donald Trump is innocent until proven guilty. But remember that adage didn’t stop Trump from calling for the death penalty after five Black and Latino youths were accused of assaulting a White 28-year-old female jogger in Central Park in April 1989. 

Less than two weeks after the widely publicized attack, Trump, then a local real-estate mogul, took out full-page ads in four New York City newspapers targeting the youths with the headline: “BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY. BRING BACK OUR POLICE!”

The teenagers, aged 14 to 16, were convicted of raping the jogger, though none of the boys’ DNA matched evidence collected at the scene. Thirteen years later, they were exonerated after a convicted rapist and murderer confessed to raping the jogger. Trump doubled down on his stance that some of the boys were involved in the attack. “These young men do not exactly have the pasts of angels,” he wrote in a 2014 column for the New York Daily News.

Well, Trump doesn’t have the past of an angel, either, but he deserves his months in court. And if convicted, he should serve his sentences in a real prison, not “home confinement.” Outgoing presidents should not get to write off a failed insurrection as a mulligan. — JMC 

From The Progressive Populist, September 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the September 15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Hal Crowther 

Apocalypse when? 

EDITORIAL 
Crime and punishment, eventually


FRANK LINGO 
Montana youths win major climate case

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
Corporate personhood: A tale worth the telling

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Missouri joins states that discourage conscientious investors

DISPATCHES 
House ‘Freedom Caucus’ is ready to force government shutdown.
Trump only cares about Trump. Trump voters only care about Trump. Trump co-conspirators are screwed.
Trump dominates Iowa, too. Republicans don’t care their guy might be a literal criminal. 
Mississippi’s culture of cruelty shows itself again, and again post-Dobbs.
Shocking new data about Trump cult ...


ART CULLEN 
An attack on freedom in Kansas

ALAN GUEBERT 
August reports show continued loss of export markets


ROBERT C. KOEHLER 
Water is life — for the privileged

JOHN YOUNG 
No greater crime than this

GENE NICHOL 
A course correction in North Carolina? 

ED RAMPELL
All the way with RFK Jr.?  

DICK POLMAN
Trump and his Georgia racketeers goose-stepped into the lives of Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman


SAM PIZZIGATI 
The Tesla take on ‘sharing’ the wealth

JULIA CONLEY 
UAW ramps up pressure on Biden to protect workers in electric vehicle transition


ROBERT KUTTNER
Will Biden have enough chips in 2024?

THOM HARTMANN
Why billionaires fund anti-trans & anti-Black-history political movements


SONALI KOLHATKAR
The rise of private cops: How not to tackle homelessness

JESSICA CORBETT
After catastropic fire, locals fear Lahaina rebuild dominated by rich outsiders

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
When greed and cruelty collide: Amputations

SAM URETSKY
Handwriting becomes obsolete

JAKE JOHNSON
Sky-high US housing costs fuel record surge in homelessness

WAYNE O’LEARY
Stuck in neutral

LAURA CLAWSON 
DeSantis takeover has left Florida’s New College in shambles as new school year starts


WINSLOW MYERS 
Lahaina and global reality


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
Panting in Norway

SETH SANDRONSKY 
California’s coastal rental costs highest in the US

RALPH NADER 
Develop an exit strategy for the endless war in Ukraine


GREGORY MCNAMEE
Wildland firefighters need our support

ROB PATTERSON
Where’s the music to help inspire today’s much needed resistance? 

ART CULLEN
Rockin’ with the Boss

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
‘Walid’: Hot on the trail of the traffickers 


OBITUARY 
Roberto “Dr. Cintli” Rodrigues, R.I.P.

From The Progressive Populist, September 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Saturday, August 12, 2023

Editorial: Demagogue’s Demise

 Special Counsel Jack Smith has finally brought the “main event” indictments in US District Court for the District of Columbia, charging Donald J. Trump with four more felonies: 

• Conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government; 

• Conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified; 

• Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct the certification of the electoral vote; and 

• Conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one’s vote count.

The Aug. 1 indictments bring to 78 the total of felony charges brought against Trump in federal and state courts so far, and Trump is likely to blow past 80 felonies when Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis reports grand jury results from Atlanta, Ga.

In addition to Trump, the indictment implicates six unnamed conspirators who may be charged later; but it also indirectly implicates Republican officials who have embraced the Big Lie that claimed Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election from Trump, and now defend his “First Amendment right to lie.”

Trump claims Jack Smith, acting for the Biden administration, was criminalizing his free speech, but Smith addressed that claim in the first page of the 45-page indictment. 

“The defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won,” Smith wrote. Trump had a constitutional right to tell his “prolific lies” – falsely claiming, for instance, that “there had been substantial fraud in certain states, such as that large numbers of dead, non-resident, non-citizen, or otherwise ineligible voters had cast ballots, or that voting machines had changed votes for the Defendant to votes for Biden.” All those lies were covered by the First Amendment. “Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.”

While Trump continues to insist he believe the election was stolen, the indictment lists the following – mostly Republicans — as among those who told Trump the election was legitimate: the vice president, senior leaders of the Justice Department, the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, senior White House attorneys, senior campaign staffers, state legislators and officials, and state and federal courts.

Trump disregarded them all, and used his position to weaponize his lies in an attempt to overthrow democracy. He crossed the line when he tried to pressure state officials to ignore election results and change electoral votes for Biden. He plotted to organize fake slates of electors in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin). And he pressured Vice President Pence to refuse to certify the election. Then, after it became public on Jan. 6 that the vice president would not fraudulently alter the election results, “a large and angry crowd — including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results — violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.”

As the indictment states, “The defendant’s knowingly false statements were integral to his criminal plans.”

Of course, under the law, Trump is considered innocent until proven guilty, but Smith has presented a pretty solid case. And, unlike the previous federal indictments in Florida relating to Trump’s refusal to return classified documents he had taken from the White House, and his alleged obstruction of that investigation, the Jan. 6 case shouldn’t be delayed by concerns over security clearances of defense attorneys and the sensitive nature of the documents at issue.

Republicans aren’t helping their case by embracing Trump’s First Amendment defense that he is being charged for his beliefs. They remain in thrall to the grifter who emerged in 2015 as a demagogic force in the Republican Party, who took advantage of the racist backlash against the presidency of Barack Obama. 

Description of Trump as a populist is ridiculous, as his whole shtick was to distract White working-class voters from the malignant works of corporate monopolists. When he unexpectedly won the presidency, he helped billionaires consolidate their control of the party, and rewarded them with a major tax break as he completed the transition of the Republican Party into the Greedy Oligarch Party. 

Trump’s cult is the opposite of the Populist movement, whose roots go back to the 1880s when farmers formed alliances to challenge the power of railroads, corporate monopolies and bankers in what became known as the Gilded Age. Farmers’ alliances organized to educate working people — Black and White, male and female — to be informed voters. They became a force on the left to force reforms on the Democratic and Republican parties heading into the 20th century.

When they organized as a political party in 1890, the Populists called for corporate regulation, a progressive income tax on the rich and increased funding for public education — reforms that were achieved in the 20th century, but have been under attack by Republicans since the Reagan administration. The Populists also called for direct election of senators and female members pressed for women’s suffrage. The People’s Party largely fell apart after the 1896 election but Populists helped grow the progressive wings of the Democratic and Republican parties and many of their proposals made it into Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s.

Trump is no populist, but he has fooled enough people to keep him in a commanding lead to win the Republican nomination again, and polls show him basically tied with President Biden, who has revived the economy since the COVID pandemic, but he isn’t getting credit for it because working families still can’t pay the rent, and gas prices are going back up as oil companies seek record profits, and the corporate media won’t tell them why that is not Biden’s fault.

We can hope for quick trial on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election. In the meantime we have a year and a quarter to convince friends and neighbors it’s worth their while to vote for Biden and the Democrats in 2024, because we can’t afford giving Trump and his radical enablers another grab at power. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, September 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us



Selections from the September 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/Richard D. Wolff 

Why capitalism is leaving the US in search of more profit

EDITORIAL 
Demagogue’s demise


FRANK LINGO 
It’s not the humidity — it’s the heat

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS 
When you have no boots to strap

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Hot enough for you? Just wait!

DISPATCHES
TPP opens new customer service office.
Two-thirds of Americans think Jan. 6 charges are serious, but less than half think Trump should drop out.
DeSantis says he would start ‘slitting throats on Day One’ if elected president.
Biden administration delays plans to restock nation’s oil reserves.
July jobs report: Good news keeps on coming.
Pro-Trump megadonor boosts RFK Jr. campaign.
GOP's 'fiscal vandalism and political sabotage' prompts second-ever US credit downgrade.
GOP wages war on food aid, data shows 35% rise in hunger ...

ART CULLEN 
Senator, are you there? We’re good. No problems. Just vote ‘aye’

ALAN GUEBERT
Russian roulette — with missiles, drones and food

KASSIDY JACOBS
Another chance to reduce child poverty

JOHN YOUNG
Better a bad dog than a mad dog

MEL GURTOV
China’s faltering economy and its implications

GENE NICHOL
The thin reed of hope in North Carolina

DICK POLMAN
‘Dishonesty, fraud and deceit’: Trump indictment reads like ‘fascism for dummies’


TOM CONWAY
Leaping onto the infrastructure bandwagon

LEW KINGSBURY
George H.W. Bush’s 9/11 legacy must be remembered

ROBERT KUTTNER
Banks: The weak spot in a strong recovery

SETH SANDRONSKY
California academic workers are rising up

SONALI KOLHATKAR
Five critical lessons from UPS’s union workers


THOM HARTMANN
The biggest issue for 2024: Can humanity survive Trump & the GOP? 

ROBERT C. KOEHLER
Immigration policy wrapped in razor wire, Robert Frost

FATIMA GUTIERREZ
Anxious about the climate? There’s a solution

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Junk insurance: One more legacy from President Trump

SAM URETSKY
Big conclusions drawn from small study

WAYNE O’LEARY
Ennui on the hustings

DRAMA REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
Judgment at Sheffield in ‘One Moment of Freedom’ 


JASON SIBERT 
Getting up to speed on hypersonic weapons

JYOTSNA NAIDU 
Democracy needs healthy debates about war and peace


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
Small town spin

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
Something there is that loves a border

STEPHEN TRIMBLE 
The problem that just won’t go away

ROB PATTERSON 
‘Oppenheimer’ reminds how brilliant and compelling high-art cinema can be

ELWOOD WATSON
Visit Florida to learn about the benefits of slavery

MOVIE REVIEW/Laura Clawson
It’s ‘Barbie,’ but the right-wing freakout is very much about Ken
and more ...

From The Progressive Populist, September 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Sunday, July 30, 2023

Editorial: Trump Enablers Get Desperate

 While Donald Trump faces dozens of felony charges in New York and Florida and grand juries in Georgia and the District of Columbia are considering more felony charges relating to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, Trump and his Republican henchmen and women are increasingly desperate to implicate President Joe Biden in criminal activity to keep up the “both sides do it” charade.

Trump’s rants on his “Truth Social” website became increasingly unhinged after he received a “target letter” from the Department of Justice July 16, indicating a grand jury in Washington was close to indicting him over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and broader efforts to overturn the election results.

“Every time you see these Radical Lunatics and their partners in the Fake News Media talking about the ‘Trials and Tribulations’ of President Donald J. Trump, please remember that it is all a coordinated HOAX… in order to STEAL ANOTHER ELECTION through PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT at levels never seen before in the U.S.,” Trump ranted July 23, adding, “[Attorney General] Merrick Garland, Deranged Jack Smith, and coordinating Democrat ‘Prosecutors’ in New York and Atlanta, have become the Campaign Managers for the most corrupt and incompetent President in United States history, Joe Biden!” 

Republicans in Congress have tried to dig up evidence implicating President Biden through Hunter Biden’s business activities while Joe Biden was vice president. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), new chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Judiciary chairman, and other Republicans have spent months chasing conspiracy theories in their probe of what Republicans call “the Biden crime family.”

In May the Trumpists found an informant they believed could provide incriminating details. Comer scheduled a press conference to unveil “devastating” information about Joe Biden’s imagined corruption. It would be “judgment day” for Biden, Comer said, predicting the scandal would make “Watergate look like jaywalking.”

The next day, Republicans released financial documents that showed Hunter was paid more than $10 million from foreign sources between 2015 and 2017. But they had no evidence of any corrupt action by Joe Biden in connection with any of his son’s business deals.

Later, Comer told Maria Bartiromo at Fox “News” the problem was an important anti-Biden witness had disappeared. “We’re hopeful that the informant is still there,” he said. Asked if his anti-Biden informant “is now missing,” Comer replied, “Well, we’re hopeful that we can find the informant.” He added, “Remember these informants are kind of in the spy business.”

Two months later, it turned out that the Republicans’ elusive informant was Gal Luft, a dual citizen of the US and Israel who has been charged with being an unregistered agent for China, trying to broker secret arms deals, violating US sanctions against Iran, and lying to federal agents. And he’s on the lam.

Of course, Republicans offered this as proof that federal law enforcement is part of an elaborate conspiracy to protect Democrats.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) released an FBI document relating to the Hunter Biden investigation July 20, in a reckless effort to hurt President Biden. The FD-1023 is used to record “raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources,” the FBI explained. The forms “do not represent the results of investigations, and “recording this information does not validate it [or] establish its credibility.” Releasing the forms could lead to threats against informants, the FBI warned. Grassley didn’t mind running that risk.

The form Grassley released, dated June 26, 2020, claims to be sourced from an unidentified businessman who was introduced to leadership at Burisma energy holdings in Ukraine in “late 2015 or early 2016” to help the company find a US company to purchase. During a meeting with Burisma leadership, the source claims he was told Hunter Biden was put on the company board to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.” When he asked why Hunter wasn’t doing the job of locating a US firm to purchase, he’s told that “Hunter is not that smart.” 

Finally, the source reported that Burisma executive Mykola Zlochevsky told him the company had to pay $5 million to Joe Biden and another $5 million to Hunter Biden because Burisma was being investigated by Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, and Burisma needed Biden to “deal with Shokin.”

However, there are a number of problems with these claims. First, Hunter Biden was not just the son of the vice president when he was placed on the board of Burisma in 2014; he had years of experience in lobbying, investment banking and corporate governance, which could help an energy company looking to expand internationally. And Shokin was fired in 2016, voted out by the Ukrainian parliament after Joe Biden made it clear that the US might withhold or delay assistance to Ukraine unless Shokin was removed. But Shokin was fired because he was not investigating cases of corruption when Ukrainian oligarchs were making off with billions. Both the US and UK governments had been pressuring Ukraine about Shokin for over a year before Joe Biden’s visit. In fact, what upset the UK government most was that Shokin was refusing to investigate Burisma.

The FBI had nearly seven months, under Trump’s DOJ, with his hand-picked FBI Director Christopher Wray, to check out the informant’s allegations, but agents apparently found nothing to back it up. 

Marcy Wheeler also explored the peculiarities of the legend of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which claims Hunter wandered into a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019, handed over a damaged laptop, completely forgot about it afterward, and the computer repairman eventually turned over the laptop to Rudy Giuliani.

Wheeler noted that in 2018 or early 2019, Hunter Biden was the target of a hack that gave an outside party access to his iCloud account, email accounts, and other data. While Hunter was receiving addiction treatment, with “limited” access online, someone was making technical changes to Hunter’s iCloud, Venmo and email accounts, raising doubts about the provenance of items found on the laptop. 

Hunter Biden made some bad decisions, and he may have profited off his father’s name, but he was not representing the US, and the only crimes traced to him by a federal prosecutor were failure to pay taxes and making a false statement to get a gun — which was not used in a violent act. Hunter Biden reached a plea bargain with the federal prosector to pay the back taxes and plead guilty on the gun charge. A fine and probation was expected, before a US District Judge in Delaware refused to accept the plea bargain July 26. 

We wouldn’t support Hunter for public office, but we don’t blame Joe Biden for continuing to support his only surviving son’s recovery from addiction. Republicans of good faith should turn their attention to actual crimes committed by Trump and his family. — JMC 

From The Progressive Populist, August 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the August 15, 2023 issue

 COVER/Nicole Carr and Lucas Waldron, ProPublica

How school board meetings became flashpoints for anger and chaos across the country

EDITORIAL 
Trump enablers get desperate


FRANK LINGO p. 3
Blood batteries power our phones

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR p. 4

DON ROLLINS p. 4
Is Black activism in shift? 

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen p. 5
This summer, don’t spread your carbon

DISPATCHES p. 5
No wonder Republicans believe in conspiracy theories.
If anyone benefits from Trump’s indictments, it’s Biden.
Dems’ growing dominance in college towns upends Republicans’ path to victory.
GOP spending cuts would kill 500,000 jobs, slam brakes on economy.
DeSantis attacks on Florida’s New College hit home as faculty flee.
Dems keep ahead of Trump’s pace with judicial nominees ...


ART CULLEN p. 6
Get me some more duct tape

ALAN GUEBERT p. 6
Climate change delay is climate change denial


DEB SITARSKY p. 7
What decades of social work taught me about poverty

JOHN YOUNG p. 7
My eye test for college admissions and hiring

GENE NICHOL p. 8
The Trumpian question for UNC administrators


DICK POLMAN p. 9
His fraudulency will soon be charged with new felonies. Some of his coup toadies already have.

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN p. 9
The Supreme Court’s gone rogue and Americans are suffering for it

TOM CONWAY p. 10
Suriving record heat

BELLA DEVAAN p. 10
Young people can’t sit on the sidelines on Social Security

DANIELLE BROWNE p. 10
Cultivating the next crop of America’s farmers


ROBERT KUTTNER p. 11
Radical problems and liberal solutions ­­­

PAUL ARMENTANO p. 11
Cannabis laws are changing. Drug testing must change too 


THOM HARTMANN p. 13
Are GOP governors killing their citizens to protect billionaires? 

DR. CINTLI p. 14
There is no such thing as humane bombs

SETH SANDRONSKY p. 14
Cal State University employees rally for better pay and benefits

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas p. 15
A new colonialism, a new raw material: Nurses

SAM URETSKY p. 15
AI can help make drugs better

WAYNE O’LEARY p. 16
Stealth revolution in health care

GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet p. 16
The nuclear debate

JOEL D. JOSEPH p. 16
Reopen the port of Odesa


N. GUNASEKARAN p. 17
The ill-effects of NATO’s eastward movement


BARRY FRIEDMAN p. 18
Trump’s luck

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson p. 18
Cage match, Libertarian style

RALPH NADER p. 19
Suggestions for progressives to become stronger


MARJORIE “SLIM” WOODRUFF p. 20
Too many tourists follow a leader

ROB PATTERSON p. 20
I’m bullish as hell on ‘The Bear’

ELWOOD WATSON p. 20
Republicans had a pretty racist week

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell p. 21
‘Oppenheimer’ doesn’t fully depict atomic bomb’s consequences

and more ...

From The Progressive Populist, August 15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

Friday, July 14, 2023

Editorial: Make College Affordable Again

 The six right wingers on the Supreme Court not only declared the end of affirmative action, which had tried to give qualified minorities access to higher education. They also snuffed out President Joe Biden’s attempt to provide relief for college grads who faced crushing debt when they got out of school.

When Biden in June 2022 announced his plan to cancel $10,000 worth of loans for people earning less than $125,000 a year, and another $10,000 for borrowers who had received Pell grants, which went to students who displayed “exceptional financial need,” it was estimated nearly 45% of borrowers, or 20 million people, would have their debt fully canceled.

For the remaining 55%, a new plan would offer more relaxed terms for loan repayment. “I just can’t underscore what a huge deal this is in millions of borrowers’ lives,” Kyra Taylor, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told ABC News in August 2022.

But many of those who paid off their loans couldn’t stand it.

“There are millions of Americans like me for whom debt forgiveness is an infuriating slap in the face after years of hard work and sacrifice,” Bethany Mandel wrote for Fox “News” June 15, 2022. “Those used to be qualities we encouraged as an American culture, and if Biden gets his way, we’ll be sending a very different message to the next generation.”

Forgiving those loans, we think, would send a message that we’re sorry we let the cost of college get so far out of control that students end up with demands to start payment on $100,000 or more on accumulated loans, in addition to their diplomas. 

The disgruntled college grads who repaid their loans should demand Republicans join Democrats in passing a bill to include a $10,000 rebate for those who paid off their loans, in addition to cancellation for those who are still in debt. Then, we could restore affordable higher education opportunities, which fueled the greatest economic boom in history in the 1950s and ’60s.

As World War II was drawing to a close, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 22, 1944, signed the GI Bill of Rights into law. It provided tuition and living expenses, as well as unemployment and housing assistance for returning veterans. It paid for 2.2 million veterans to attend colleges and universities, and 5.6 million got training for good jobs after they got home. (Of course, a disproportionate share of the benefits went to White veterans.) Economists later found that GI Bill veterans ended up paying $7 in taxes for every dollar spent to educate them, and the newly middle-class vets built the consensus that children of working-class families should have access to higher education. 

The National Defense Education Act was passed in 1958 and signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower to provide funding to colleges and universities and low-interest National Defense Student Loans to “promising, yet needy students” of mathematics, engineering and foreign languages, as well as those who desired to teach in elementary or secondary schools. The Act was amended in 1964 to provide loans to other students, and the Higher Education Act was passed in 1965 to provide more assistance to universities and financial assistance for students. University enrollment, which was only about a half million in 1940, grew to 7.6 million in 1970, helped by relatively low tuition at state universities. 

Many states kept their university tuition low, at least for their residents. Texans used to be proud that university costs were low enough that the children of working-class parents could pursue a college education. In 1970, the state paid 85% of the cost of running the state’s universities, and tuition and fees for the regular workload of 15 hours was $104 per semester for Texas residents.

Many Boomers have the federal and state support for public universities to thank for giving them access to colleges and universities.

But conservatives soured on education for the masses and Ronald Reagan led the movement to curb access to unversities. He was elected governor of California in 1966 with confrontational rhetoric toward the University of California sysstem. Reagan repeatedly vowed “to clean up the mess” at UC Berkeley, which had become a national center of organizing against the Vietnam War. Reagan cut the state’s higher education budgets until the UC Board of Regents was forced to approve the system’s first tuition charges in 1970.

The success of Reagan’s attacks on California public colleges inspired conservative politicians across the US, Jon Schwarz noted at TheIntercept.com Aug. 25, 2022. President Richard Nixon decried “campus revolt.” Vice President Spiro Agnew complained that, thanks to open admissions policies, “unqualified students are being swept into college on the wave of the new socialism.”

Roger A. Freeman, an educational adviser to Nixon who was born in 1904 in Vienna, Austria, and fled to the US after the rise of Hitler, was an economist who became a fixture in conservative politics, serving on the White House staff during both the Dwight Eisenhower and Nixon administrations. He helped Reagan in his 1970 re-election campaign, and Freeman said at an Oct. 29, 1970, press conference, less than a week before the election, “We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat. … That’s dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow [to go to college].”

“If not,” Freeman continued, “we will have a large number of highly trained and unemployed people.” Freeman also said — taking a highly idiosyncratic perspective on the cause of fascism —“that’s what happened in Germany. I saw it happen.”

So Reagan forced UC to charge tuition in 1970 and federal and bank officials demanded City University of New York charge tuition in 1976, as a condition for city bankruptcy relief.

After Reagan became president in 1981, he cut federal aid to public education and tried to abolish the US Department of Education. He reduced higher education funding by 25%., and the federal government’s involvement in student aid shifted from grants to loans. He also eliminated Social Security payments to full-time students who were children of disabled, retired or deceased workers.

In 2022-23, the average cost of attending college (tuition and fees, room and board, and allowances for books and supplies, transportation and other personal expenses) for full-time undergraduate students ranged from $19,230 for public two-year in-district students and $27,940 for public four-year in-state students to $45,240 for public four-year out-of-state students and $57,570 for private nonprofit four-year students, the College Board reported.

To restore the principle that every student should be able to pursue higher education according to their skills, state legislatures should step up to make public universities affordable to students working no more than 20 hours a week. At the current minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, that means tuition should be no more than $3,625 a semester (or $7,250 a year). And the federal government should restore generous financial aid to boost students coming from lower-income families. No longer should graduates get a note that they owe more than $100,000 along with their diploma. — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, August 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist

 

Selections from the August 1, 2023 issue

 COVER/Daniel Ross

Medicine residue is everywhere in our rivers and lakes — and fish are behaving strangely

EDITORIAL 
Make college affordable again


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

DON ROLLINS 
Africa: In peril from without

RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Support your local dairies

DISPATCHES 
Biden acts to limit unexpected health costs.
A great jobs report and vindication of Bidenomics.
Inflation Reduction Act is turning us into renewable energy superpower.
Biden’s legislative wins a boon for battleground Democrats.
Corporate profits surged to $1 trillion a year as working people suffer ...

ART CULLEN
A little hope amidst the haze

ALAN GUEBERT
Supreme Court’s recent clean water ruling makes everything murkier


PHYLLIS BENNIS
A tale of two tragedies at sea

JOHN YOUNG 
A kill shot against democracy that missed

GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Unpack the court!

DICK POLMAN 
A homophobic trifecta: Fake facts, fake case, and a high court with cratering credibility 

GENE NICHOL 
Wounding mission accomplished

TOM CONWAY 
American workers demand Julie Su’s confirmation

SAM PIZZIGATI 
Want to reclaim the spirit of 1776? Reduce inequality

FRANK LINGO
Biden finally restoring species protections

ROBERT KUTTNER 
Will Tai prevail over the corporate undertow? 

THOM HARTMANN  
GOP: “How dare you tell the truth!”

DR. CINTLI 
Wars and interventions: Corruption, American style

ALLIYAH LUSUEGRO 
To clear the air, cut military spending

HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
More egregiously woke books to ban

SAM URETSKY 
Big Pharma’s money talks

MARK ANDERSON 
Bad term at BlackRock

WAYNE O’LEARY 
Class, capitalism and democrats

SETH SANDRONSKY
Supreme Court decision provides challenge for Affirmative Action in California’s higher education


JOEL D. JOSEPH 
Proposed California reparations are not justified


BARRY FRIEDMAN 
When the chainsaw breaks

SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
Putin’s fire sale

RALPH NADER 
What’s the matter with the ‘liberal press’?


RICK KNIGHT 
Restoring the land can feel a lot like fun

ROB PATTERSON 
The gifts of great books

BOOK REVIEW/Ken Winkes  
Poverty is a choice America makes

FILM REVIEW/Ed Rampell  
Salt of the Earth

From The Progressive Populist, August 1, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist


Tuesday, July 4, 2023

NRA Bull, by Kevin Kreneck

 

NRA Bull: With mass shootings happening much more frequently, and congressional refusal to do anything to stop the carnage, it has come to pass that we now live in an NRA world.

Monday, June 26, 2023

Turtle tank (inching toward war)

W
With diplomatic options running out, war between the Super Powers - USA, Russia, China - is looming. 
By Kevin Kreneck


 

Elephant Piranha

By Kevin Kreneck

As the Republican Party becomes more fractured and dysfunctional, 
it's becoming less and less recognizable as an organization.

 

Beached Whale Elephant

 

By Kevin Kreneck
Can the Republican Party survive its current state of dysfunction?

Friday, June 23, 2023

Editorial: GOP’s Disinfo Wars

 After former President Donald Trump was indicted for his misuse of classified documents, Republican leaders largely embraced Trump’s claims that he did nothing wrong and the charges are politically motivated. “Most Republicans believe we live in a country where Hillary Clinton did very similar things and nothing happened to her,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said June 11 in an ABC News interview.

Graham has come a long way since May 3, 2016, when he said, as Trump was on the verge of becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, ”If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed ... and we will deserve it.” Snopes.com noted that Graham repeatedly said Trump was not qualified to be president and that his involvement in the election process was damaging to the Republican party. 

Graham lost whatever principles he once had as he became one of Trump’s most vocal defenders. But his prophecy is coming true as the Republican National Committee is requiring candidates to pledge support for the party’s eventual nominee, even if he is criminally indicted in several jurisdictions.

After Trump’s June 13 arraignment in federal court in Miami on 37 felony counts, he was released on his own recognizance, which is very unusual for persons charged with violations of the Espionage Act. He also was allowed to keep his passport, which is even more unusual. The magistrate ordered Trump not to talk with his indicted aide, Walt Nauta about the case without their lawyers.

Upon his release, Trump went to a Cuban cafe in Miami, where he offered to buy lunch for patrons, then left without paying, and he flew back to New Jersey, where, at a fundraiser at his Bedminster, N.J. golf club, Trump claimed President Joe Biden had him arrested on “fake and fabricated charges.” There is no evidence Biden played any role in Trump’s case. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed career prosecutor Jack Smith as special counsel in the case to avoid perception of political interference.

Trump said the Presidential Records Act gave him “sole discretion” to “segregate personal materials,” but the National Archives and Records Administration said the documents at issue were clearly government property, not personal materials, and the charges were brought under the Espionage Act, which prohibits willful retention of national defense information and has been used to prosecute about a dozen people accused of holding on to classified documents over the past five years, the New York Times reported.

Trump claimed he “had every right to have these documents” because a judge in 2012 determined audiotapes Bill Clinton made of interviews with an author when Clinton was president, which were reportedly kept in in Clinton’s sock drawer in the White House, were personal records. But Trump’s Mar-a-Lago documents were labeled “classified” and clearly were related to national defense. They were not personal.

Trump also sought to revive the controversy over Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account for exchanges with her staff during her time as secretary of state, but the hundreds of classified documents stored in boxes in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence are not comparable, experts told PolitiFact. 

“The situation of Mrs. Clinton is, at most, only superficially comparable to what has been alleged against Mr. Trump in the federal indictment,” said Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases. 

PolitiFact noted Clinton’s email troubles started in 2014, when the Republican-dominated House Select Committee on Benghazi asked the State Department for all of her emails. The department didn’t have them all because Clinton used a personal email address housed on private servers in her Chappaqua, New York, home.

Clinton’s lawyers combed through the private server and turned over about 30,000 work-related emails to the State Department and deleted the rest, which Clinton said involved personal matters, such as her daughter’s wedding plans.

On July 5, 2016 — four months before the presidential election — the FBI released its findings on Clinton’s emails. In summary, it said classified information had been improperly transmitted, but carelessness, not an intent to skirt the law, was the cause. 

Then-FBI Director James Comey said of the 30,000 emails, 113 were determined to have contained classified information at the time they were sent. Comey said three of those had a marking indicating they were classified, and that 2,000 more were marked as classified after the fact by various agencies.

A 2018 Justice Department review of how the FBI handled its investigation noted that prosecutors found no evidence that Clinton and her colleagues ever intended to put classified materials into their email exchanges.

Ironically, suspected Russian hackers gained access to the State Department’s email system in 2015. The cyber attackers who breached the State Department’s system are also believed to be behind hacks on the White House’s email system, several other federal agencies, as well as the Democratic and Republican national committees. But the FBI said in August 2018 that it has no evidence Hillary Clinton’s private email server was compromised, even though then-President Trump tweeted a news report that alleged the Chinese had hacked it.

After leaving the White House, in January 2021, Trump took troves of boxes containing hundreds of classified documents to his home in Florida, according to the federal indictment released June 9, and he refused to return many of them when the National Archives and Records Administration requested them.

“Trump was not authorized to possess or retain those classified documents,” according to the indictment by a federal grand jury in Miami. And Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s residence and social club, “was not an authorized location” to keep, display or discuss classified documents.

Trump kept documents that included information about defense weapons capabilities, the United State’s nuclear programs and US military weaknesses throughout the property, the indictment said. The indictment includes photos of stacks of boxes stored in a ballroom, bathroom, shower, storage room and his bedroom. 

When instructed to turn over all documents with classification markings, Trump did not comply, the indictment said. Instead, investigators said Trump suggested his attorneys lie to the FBI and the grand jury, instructed his aide to move and conceal the boxes, and suggested his attorney destroy the documents.

Trump’s defense so far has consisted mainly of unfounded claims and diversions from his culpability. And the Greedy Oligarch Party has backed up his campaign of lies, to their shame.  — JMC

From The Progressive Populist, July 1-15, 2023


Populist.com

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links

About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us


Copyright © 2023 The Progressive Populist