There might be some possibility of convincing Donald Trump
and the Republicans not to build a wall along the Mexican border if they
sincerely felt threatened by an invasion of undocumented immigrants. Once they
learned that more of the undocumented have been leaving the country than
entering over the past few years, once they computed the true cost of a new
wall, once they saw the Department of Justice estimates of the low number of
people a wall would prevent from entering—all of these facts might sway them to
change their minds and not pursue this enormously expensive boondoggle.
Unfortunately, Trumpty-Dumpty and his GOP cohorts act not
out of a misguided effort to solve a non-existent problem, but for two
intertwined cynical reasons. Most GOP members—but perhaps not the unread and
inexperienced Trump—know that undocumented immigrants are not a security threat
to the United States and that between Presidents Bush II and Obama, we have already
pumped up border patrols, rounded up and deported the “bad guys,” and
instituted “extreme vetting.” They continue to use the wall as a political
catalyst to enrage and frighten voters, and especially those prone to Nativist
or racist views. They can’t be convinced the wall is nonsense, because they already
know it and don’t care. That’s why the GOP and Trump are proposing anaccelerated timetable for starting construction on a wall instead of quietlydropping it as another in many empty campaign promises.
The second reason has to do with money. Trump represents the
apotheosis of the post-Reagan Republican Party in many ways, but no more so
than in his belief that the real function of government is to collect taxes for
use by private industry, one of the pillars of Republicanism since the days of
Ronald Reagan. Trump is the ultimate crony capitalist. He has bragged in the
past of buying the support of politicians. Many of his developments received
governmental aid of one sort or another. Many of his cabinet members, most
notably the incoming Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, have dedicated their
careers to privatizing essential government functions.
And have no doubt about it, building a wall is the ripest,
juiciest, lowest hanging fruit on the tree of government largess to
corporations because it doesn’t take much more expertise than knowing how to
set rebar and pour concrete to do it. If we were talking about building a
fighter jet, the government would have two companies from which to choose. Not
many more if we were talking about investing billions of dollars in improving
our cybersecurity. But there are dozens of large and small contractors in every
state with the experience and capabilities to build Trump’s wall. That means
that there are going to be many opportunities for Trump and Republican members
of Congress to reward their friends with contracts for building the wall. It’s
going to be the biggest swindle of the American people since Bush II’s Iraq
War, which was in large part fought by what used to be called mercenaries, i.e.,
private firms contracted by the Department of Defense to provide key military
services that the military once did for itself.
While it provides a lot of government contracts, the new
wall between the United States and Mexico will make no one safer nor keep many
people out. It’s nothing more than “make-busy” work.
It seems as if Trump and the Republican congress have
prioritized this kind of “make-busy” work as the most important platform
promises to get started fulfilling. They are behaving as a bunch of ten year
olds cutting scrap paper or moving files to help mommy at her job on “Take Your
Kid to Work” day. Besides authorizing the funds to begin building a wall, the
Republicans are hell-bent in repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act, which will likely turn out to be another make-busy waste of time.
Here’s why: The problem is that Congress has only three
choices in repealing Obamacare:
1.
Take away the health insurance of 20 million
Americans, while putting three million people out of work, increasing the cost
of health insurance for everyone else and increasing the deficit.
OR
2.
Go to a single payer system (which FYI wouldn’t
really hurt insurance companies if we followed the German model, but will have
a great financial effect on physicians and hospitals)
OR
3.
Reconstruct a system that looks pretty much like
Obamacare: a delicate balance of taxes, incentives, subsidies and important benefits
that the American public have quickly come to believe are birthrights, such as accepting
people for coverage with pre-existing conditions, not having a lifetime cap on
coverage and keeping children on parents’ insurance until age 26. Ending
coverage for pre-existing conditions would in and of itself lead to an
estimated 53 million people losing their healthcare insurance.
The cynical GOP know the first option will lead to certain
defeat at the polls and that the second one looks too much like socialism, so my
prediction is that the GOP’s version of healthcare reform will resemble what we
currently have, with the possible addition of a very small voucher program to
justify the clamor that the healthcare system must operate more on free market
principles.
That means that like the wall, the GOP’s healthcare reform
process will likely waste a lot of time—and money—in meaningless activity.
Pass the juice box, Paulie. And don’t horde all the paper
clips and staples, Donnie.
