Friday, April 10, 2020

Editorial: Save the Post Office and Elections

It’s not too soon to start planning how to hold a general election if the coronavirus pandemic is still keeping people afraid to go to public polling places, much less work at them, in November. But Donald Trump and the Republican leadership apparently would like to keep the US Postal Service out of the voting process.

Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, proposed to give $4 billion to the states to help them pay for voting by mail, with the provision that the states eliminate the requirement in many states that voters have an excuse, such as illness or plans to be out of state, to qualify for an absentee ballot. But in negotiations on the $2.2 trillion coronavirus stimulus bill in late March, Senate Republicans, led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, only agreed to give the states $400 million for states to prepare for primaries and the general election and rejected the effort to expand voting by mail.

Trump on March 30, in an interview with Fox & Friends, said Democrats wanted to make it too easy to vote. “The things they had in there were crazy. They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

That’s right, Trump said out loud what Republicans have been quietly expressing for years. Voter suppression is necessary for them to remain in power. From requiring state-issued photo IDs that exclude non-drivers, to reducing the number of polling places, to making it more difficult to vote by mail, and allowing Republican election officials to arbitrarily remove voters from the rolls, since the 1980s Republicans have been all about suppressing the vote of minorities, students and identifiable Democrats.

Trump on April 3 said he’s confident the general election won’t be delayed by the coronavirus, but he rejected the idea that every state should prepare to conduct mail-in voting. “No, because I think a lot of people cheat with mail-in voting,” said Trump, who has made baseless accusations about voter fraud since he won the presidency despite losing the popular vote in 2016.

Republicans also opposed a bailout for the financially-strapped Postal Service, which has been hit hard by the loss of first-class and commercial mail as a result of the pandemic recession.

House Oversight Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., and Rep. Gerry Conolly, D-Va., who runs the subcommittee that oversees the Postal Service, sounded the alarm that the agency could run out of funding altogether by June if Congress doesn’t act soon. First class mail has been dropping steadily since 2001. First class and commercial mail brought in $41 billion in fiscal year 2019, but revenue has dropped rapidly with the outbreak of COVID-19 and USPS expects a revenue loss of up to $17 billion between now and the end of the fiscal year as a result of the crisis. Maloney and Connolly sought $25 billion in emergency appropriations for the Postal Service to keep it from going broke by June.

The stimulus bill allows the Postal Service, which has 630,000 employees, to borrow $10 billion to keep operating, but Connolly called that “a slap in the face, and it’s not what they need,” in an interview with the Federal News Network. “They don’t need more debt capacity, they need debt forgiveness.”

Still, Connolly told WUSA-TV in Washington, D.C., “Trump personally objected to any assistance for the Postal Service.”

USPS on March 27 issued a statement saying it “remained concerned this measure will be insufficient to enable the Postal Service to withstand the significant downturn in our business that could directly result from the pandemic.”

Asked if he believed the Trump administration is deliberately allowing the Postal Service to fail, Connolly said, ”I don’t know that it’s a strategy, but I think they would not be bothered by the collapse of the Postal Service.”

Trump has, in the past, signaled his desire to privatize the service.

What does Trump have against the Postal Service?

Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times wrote in a Jan. 9 column that the Postal Service is the most popular government agency, as the Pew Research Center found 90% of the public has a favorable view, outdistancing the National Park Service and NASA.

“Yet the conservative drumbeat for privatizing this crucial service never seems to slacken, even though privatization, which would inevitably mean crummy service and immense price increases, would be the surest route to turning public admiration for the USPS into public scorn,” Hiltzik wrote.

The Constitution provides, in Article 1, Section 8, that among Congress’ powers is to “establish Post Offices and post Roads,” along with the power to tax and borrow, declare war, coin money, establish federal courts and issue patents and copyrights.

But Congress has made it harder for the Postal Service to operate at a profit. In 2006, a Republican Congress under President George W. Bush mandated that USPS prepay $5.6 billion a year over 10 years its future expected retiree healthcare benefits. The Postal Service stopped paying in 2012 because it didn’t have the money, but it still has an accrued obligation of more than $47 billion.

Without the advance retiree health benefit obligation (which is imposed on no other federal agency), USPS would have a modest operating profit every year since 2013, according to a task force empaneled by Trump and led by the Treasury Department. But the Postal Service still faces a collapse in first-class mail. As Americans switched to automatic bill payment, email and evites, volume fell 47% from 2001 to 2019, to 54.9 billion pieces.

Parcel deliveries have taken up some slack, but that is what drew Trump’s ire, as he claimed in a 2017 tweet that the service was being made “dumber and poorer” by undercharging Amazon. Trump’s outburst was widely seen as an attack on Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post. Postmaster General Megan Brennan countered that the contract was fair and that, in any case, the rates were independently set by the Postal Regulatory Commission.

Critics of the USPS say UPS, FedEx and other delivery services could replace the Postal Service, but those commercial firms’ rely on the Postal Service to deliver packages the last mile in many remote, rural areas, since the Postal Service has an obligation to provide universal service that sends mail carriers past 150 million addresses six days a week. There’s no way a private service would undertake to deliver a first-class letter across the United States for less than a dollar. (It’s currently 55 cents, if you haven’t send a letter lately.) And we shudder to think what periodical delivery would cost.

Trump’s Office of Management and Budget in June 2018 proposed privatizing the Postal Service, which it said would “have a substantially lower cost structure, be able to adapt to changing customer needs and make business decisions free from political interference.”

In other words, Hiltzik noted, it would cut pay and staffing, while abandoning customers and communities far from the beaten path. “This is how free-market businesses such as cable operators work — they serve dense, high-population areas but keep remote places that are costly and difficult to serve out of their business plans.”

That’s nuts. The Founders recognized the importance of a public postal service when they included it in the Constitution, and universal postal service remains vital to protecting democracy. And this year, the Postal Service could be a vital cog in protecting election access. — JMC



From The Progressive Populist, May 1, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist

Selections from the May 1, 2020 issue

COVER/Hal Crowther
Going viral: Fighting for oxygen in Trump’s America


EDITORIAL
Save the post office and elections


ASHAR FOLEY
Coronavirus proves it: We need Medicare for All


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

DON ROLLINS
Joseph Lowery, organizer for justice


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
We’re all in this together


DISPATCHES
Trump keeps touting virus ‘cure’ despite death, extreme illness and doctors’ warnings;
Trump’s COVID lies are about to hit the wall;
Rural Americans fear virus after losing hospitals;
New polls raise hopes of Dems flipping Senate;
Masks, other protective gear are being stolen from states and nations, but by whom?
COVID-19 shutdown may have left 3.5 million workers without insurance;
Scamle for rapid COVID-19 test everybody wants ...


ART CULLEN
Tough times


ADAM TURTLE
What is at risk and what we can do now


JILL RICHARDSON
Efficiency vs. resilience


JOHN YOUNG
Who’ll play Dan Patrick’s hunger games?


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Crisis at the borders


BOOK REVIEW/Roger Bybee
Time to merge left


THOM HARTMANN
The coronavirus crash could be worse than the Republican Great Depression of 1930


KEVIN BASL
Thank farmers and grocery workers for their service


FRANK LINGO
Earth Day turns 50


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
The lure of vertical integration, or the Walmart model


SAM URETSKY
The best cure for COVID-19 so far is prevention 


JASON SIBERT
The mightiest country’s weaknesses are exposed


WAYNE O’LEARY
Absentee president


JOHN BUELL
Hospital shortages: The corporate media’s unsung story


ROBERTO Dr. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ
Time to renounce the church’s dark ages thinking


BOB BURNETT
Ready or not, here comes the recession


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
Waiting for the man


ROB PATTERSON 
‘Succession’ sets siblings against each other

SETH SANDRONSKY
Standardized tests in the time of COVID-19


INTERVIEW/Ed Rampell
Introducing Tanya Alexander, the rising star of L.A. theatre


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
Happy talk, we’re talking happy talk


and more ...

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Editorial: Trump Botches Virus Response

Republicans have been accusing Democrats of politicizing the coronavirus pandemic, because the Grand Oligarch Party desperately hopes to avoid accountability for the Trump administration’s botching of the response to the crisis.

Trump isn’t responsible for the virus coming out of China, but he is responsible for his administration’s incompetent reaction since Chinese authorities told the United Nations’ World Health Organization about the epidemic on Dec. 31.

The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discussed the potential impact of the virus with Chinese health authorities on Jan. 3 and US intelligence officials warned Trump and Congress about the global danger posed by the coronavirus in early January, the Washington Post reported March 20, but the White House waited weeks before they begin implementing public health measures that might have slowed the spread of the virus and Trump continued to minimize the threat posed by the virus in his tweets and public statements.

“Inside the White House, Trump’s advisers struggled to get him to take the virus seriously, according to multiple officials with knowledge of meetings among those advisers and with the president,” the Post reported. But Trump resisted and continued to assure Americans that the coronavirus would never run rampant as it had in other countries.

“I think it’s going to work out fine,” Trump said on Feb. 19. “I think when we get into April, in the warmer weather, that has a very negative effect on that and that type of a virus.”
“The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA,” Trump tweeted five days later. “Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”

Trump boasts that on Feb. 3 (two months after US officials learned about the threat) he banned foreigners who had been to China in the previous 14 days from entering US, but the CDC confirmed the first coronavirus case in the US on Jan. 21 and federal authorities were unwilling and/or unable to ramp up the nation’s testing capabilities.

The World Health Organization in mid-January adopted a test developed by German scientists, which might have allowed the US to start widespread testing in January. Instead, US authorities tried to develop their own tests, which were flawed and delayed distribution.

After a historic drop in the stock market in late February, Trump finally set up a task force to address the virus on Feb. 26, and put Vice President Mike Pence in charge of the effort, but he continued to minimize the threat, which he called a Democratic “hoax.” Two days later, Trump predicted a “miracle” would make the virus disappear.

Trump finally declared a national emergency on March 13, but he said, “I don’t take any responsibility at all,” for the federal response for the outbreak. Instead, he blamed the Obama administration for the delay in conducting wide-scale testing. Trump apparently referred to the Project Bioshield Act of 2004 — during the George W. Bush administration — which enabled the Food and Drug Administration to require labs to get agency permission to perform certain tests during a public health emergency. But the reasons the Trump administration blocked the UN-approved tests remain unclear.

Three days later, on March 16 — nearly three months after first receiving warnings from his intelligence officials — Trump finally admitted that all was not well: “I’ve always known this is a real — this is a pandemic,” he said as he admitted, “[the virus is] not under control for any place in the world.” He endorsed “social distancing” for at least 15 days to keep the virus from spreading, but left it to governors and local officials to order people to stay at home. And he suggested people might need to go back to work March 30 to reopen the economy, regardless of whether the contagion is under control.

Trump could order factories converted to produce protective gear and ventilators under the Defense Production Act to prepare for an expected rush of patients, but he has refused to follow through, reportedly because he doesn’t want to look like a socialist.

Trump also refused to release protective gear and ventilators from a federal stockpile, arguing that “We’re not a shipping clerk,” and told governors to find their own face masks and ventilators.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also lectured Chinese authorities about being more transparent about the virus, which would be laughable, coming from the secretive and press-bashing Trump administration, if the matter weren’t so serious.

Congress passed two coronavirus relief packages, the first $8.3 billion bill providing funding for research and development of vaccines, the CDC, FDA and Agency for International Development and state and local public health efforts; the second bill, costing $105 billion, provides for free tests (when you can get them) and ordered two weeks of paid sick leave for some workers who are idled because of the pandemic and up to 12 weeks of paid family leave for parents who are caring for children whose schools have closed.

At press time, Democrats were balking at a third stimulus bill, estimated to cost $1.8 trillion, in which Senate Republicans proposed to give Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin broad discretion to secretly dole out $500 billion in grants and loans to bail out corporations, many of which used tax relief in 2018 to buy back their own stock rather than invest the windfall in expanding their businesses.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has been a leader in the Democratic response to the virus emergency. Warren on March 17 rolled out eight conditions she argued should be placed on any company that receives government funds to help stay afloat during the pandemic, including a permanent ban on stock buybacks, a three-year ban on dividends or executive bonuses, a $15 minimum wage and setting aside board seats for employee-elected representatives. She also calls on cancelling $10,000 in student loan debt.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., staked out a similar position. And in the days since, Trump and some Republican senators have indicated they would back restrictions on bailouts going to stock buybacks.

“To earn Democratic support in the Congress, any economic stimulus proposal must include new, strong and strict provisions that prioritize and protect workers, such as banning the recipient companies from buying back stock, rewarding executives, and laying off workers,” Schumer and Pelosi said in a joint statement.

Joe Biden, who announced March 23 he would take a more active role in criticizing Trump’s response to the health crisis, embraced a proposal by Schumer, Warren and Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden (D) to increase Social Security benefits by $200 a month for all recipients over the next two years. Biden also supported the student debt cancellation proposal.

Pelosi on March 23 unveiled House Democrats’ stimulus package, which includes funding for states to carry out a mandate to ensure America can hold its November elections as scheduled in a safe manner, even if the coronavirus continues to be a threat.

The Democrats include $4 billion to help states implement voting by mail. The bill would require that states offer 15 days of in-person early voting, allow registered voters to cast ballots by mail without an excuse, and mail every registered voter a ballot in case of an emergency like the current one. Additionally, the bill mandates that online and same-day voter registration be made available in every state.

Republicans likely will be hostile to the effort to make it easier to vote, but Democrats should hold the line and demand that any further stimulus measures guarantee that citizens have the right to cast a vote in November. — JMC

Update: The coronavirus relief bill Congress passed Friday, March 27, did not go as far as Democrats hoped, but it will deliver cash payments to practically everyone in America, expand unemployment insurance for people who lose their jobs due to the pandemic and prevent people from losing their jobs in the first place, so that their employers remain their main source of income, Arthur Delaney reported at HuffPost

The bill creates a $350 billion “paycheck protection program” that essentially pays small businesses not to lay off their workers for the duration of the outbreak. The government will lend money to firms to cover their payroll and other costs for eight weeks, and then forgive the loan if the firms avoid layoffs. 

The unemployment compensation, by contrast, amounts to about $260 billion, according to an estimate by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, while the rebate payments to households amount to $290 billion. 

Employers who lose business or are ordered to shut down because of the outbreak can also get a refundable tax credit for part of their payroll costs. 

The bill included $400 million to help states pay for voting by mail, but Senate Republicans refused to agree to the requirement that states allow voters to cast ballots by mail without an excuse. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said House Democrats agreed to the compromise bill to hurry the processing of assistance to working families who are stressed by the coronavirus emergency but she noted Democrats would push for the vote-by-mail requirement and other provisions in future bills.


From The Progressive Populist, April 15, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist


Friday, March 27, 2020

Selections from the April 15, 2020 issue

COVER/Marshall Auerback 
What will the post-coronavirus global economy look like?

EDITORIAL
Trump botches virus response


WENDELL POTTER
Coronavirus pandemic reveals just how devastating the greed of for-profit insurance has become


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Pastors as politicians


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Build strength close to home


DISPATCHES
Affordable Care Act marks 10th birthday in Trump’s pandemic;
Hospitals scramble to face COVID-19, FEMA can’t say how many masks are on the way;
Hospitals fear there aren’t enough ventilators for COVID patients;
Democratic voe still like Medicare for All;
Democratic voters still like Medicare for All;
Trump gets a boost in polls, but why?
White nationalists seek to weaponize COVID-19 pandemic;
Thinking outside the box: Giving Steven Mnuchin a $500 billion debit card;
Maybe don't give William Barr the power to take a chainsaw to habeas corpus;
Climate and policy experts call for green stimulus bill to put Americans back to work;
Child abuse cases increase;
Ky. legislature rushes stricter voter ID bill through lege ...


ART CULLEN
Time to think our way out of our ills


JIM GOODMAN
Vote your heart


JILL RICHARDSON
We’re all in this together


JOSEPH B. ATKINS
The establishment fights back against Sanders


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Vulnerable and forgotten: The homeless and COVID-19


TOM CONWAY
OSHA needs a prescription for safety


JOHN YOUNG
Open a window, America


ROBERTO DR. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ
When a virus and virulent racial supremacy collide


MICHAEL WINSHIP
Trump’s brand is chaos


GENE NICHOL
We’re off


SAM PIZZIGATI and SARAH ANDERSON
Coronavirus and the ‘shock doctrine’


DICK POLMAN
Churchill vs. Vaudeville: Who would you prefer in a crisis? 


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Lessons from the Twilight Zone: Feds need to back up state and local governments


SAM URETSKY
Barring the door against coronavirus 


FRANK LINGO
There’s more than corona out there


WAYNE O’LEARY
Back to politics as usual


JOHN BUELL
COVID-19 and the real Italian lesson


SETH SANDRONSKY
Reclaiming vacant homes


DAVID J. SCHMIDT
Marching against oblivion: International Women’s Day in Mexico City


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
On diversity


ROB PATTERSON
Legacy music


BOB BURNETT
Joe Biden: Pro and con


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell
The day of the hunters: Must we burn Blumhouse? 


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
Time Magazine’s Person of the Year


and more ...

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Editorial: Biden Rises Back to Life

Bernie Sanders perhaps got a little heady after his success in the first three Democratic primary contests. After battling Pete Buttigieg to a draw in Iowa and New Hampshire, Sanders appeared to hit his stride when he roared out of Nevada with a head of steam, based on a 40% plurality in a seven-candidate race, which got him 24 national delegates, but after five years calling for a revolution that would break up the Democratic establishment, he shouldn’t have been surprised when the establishment fought back.

But Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., was The Man who brought Joe Biden back to life with his endorsement three days before the South Carolina primary, and that was the sign black voters, who form the base of the state’s Democratic Party, needed as they helped Biden get 48% of the primary vote in South Carolina for the former vice president’s first win. That set up a showdown on March 3, when 14 states voted on “Super Tuesday.”

Exit polls showed majorities of Democratic voters in every Super Tuesday state said they would prefer a nominee who can beat Trump over one with whom they agree on other issues. Clyburn’s advice resonated, along with the endorsements of former rivals Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke on the eve of Super Tuesday, and they apparently helped Democratic voters conclude that Biden had the best chance of beating Trump and helping downballot Democratic candidates. Biden won Super Tuesday with 63% of Alabama primary voters, 53.3% in Virginia, 43% in North Carolina, 41.7% in Tennessee, 40.5% in Arkansas, 38.7% in Oklahoma, 38.6% in Minnesota, 34.5% in Texas, 34% in Maine and 33.5% in Massachusetts. Bernie won Colorado with 36.8%, Utah with 32.8% and his home state of Vermont with 50.7%. A week after the election, California was still being counted, but Sanders led with 34%. However, on March 10 Biden won primaries in Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi and Idaho.

Sanders had to be disappointed in the failure of younger voters to turn out en masse for the Super Tuesday primaries. Participation by voters younger than 30 didn’t exceed 20% in any state, according to an analysis of exit polls.

Given the huge turnout, including youth turnout, in the 2018 midterms, many had predicted, or at least hoped, that the trend would continue during the 2020 Democratic primaries. But so far, at least, there is no clear evidence of greater participation by the young people that Sanders has said he can motivate to get out to the polls.

Young voters were an important part of the coalition that propelled Sanders to victory in California, where Sanders led Biden by 34% to 27.2%. But those under age 30, who voted for Sanders over Biden by 61% to 7%, made up just 11% of the electorate, according to exit polls. Another 35% were between the ages of 45 and 64, and they split between Biden (27%) and Sanders (26%), while voters who were 65 or older were 30% of the electorate and they voted for Biden over Sanders, 38% to 18%.

In Texas, voters under 30 voted for Sanders over Biden by a margin of 58% to 13%, but just 15% of voters were younger than 30, while 38% were between 45 and 64, and they voted for Biden over Sanders 42% to 21%, and 25% were 65 and older, and those seniors voted for Biden over Sanders by 43% to 16%.

Even in Sanders’ home state of Vermont, voters younger than 30 made up just 11% of Super Tuesday voters, according to exit polls. Nearly 70% of voters were over age 45.

Health care remains an important issue for Democratic voters, and exit polls showed a majority of voters in every Democratic primary so far supporting a government-run plan that replaces private health insurance. Support for a government insurance plan ranged from 50% in Massachusetts and South Carolina to 58% in Michigan and Missouri, 63% in Texas, 69% in Maine and 73% in Vermont.

But even if Democrats regain the Senate majority, they have been told they can’t expect a Medicare for All bill to pass Congress anytime soon because Republicans would block it with a filibuster in the Senate, which normally would require 60 votes to overcome. That would require Democrats to oust 13 Republicans. Including special elections in Arizona and Georgia, Republicans will be defending 23 seats in November, but flipping 13 seats is on the far side of unlikely. However, if Democrats pick up three seats and win the vice presidency, they would regain control of the Senate. If they keep control of the House — and if the Supreme Court declares the ACA unconstitutional — Democrats could pass most of the elements of the Medicare expansion through the Senate with a simple majority by using the budget reconciliation process.

Democrats used the reconciliation process to amend the Affordable Care Act in 2010 and Republicans used the process to try to repeal the ACA (and to pass their massive tax cut for billionaires and corporations) in 2017.

Democrats might not be able to pass all of the provisions of the Medicare for All bills sponsored by Sanders in the Senate and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) in the House through reconciliation, but they could lower the eligibility age for Medicare and eliminate cost sharing, as amendments to the Social Security Act. Biden would rather reinforce the ACA and add the public option for Medicare, but the Supreme Court could force the Democrats’ hand by overturning Obamacare after the election, as Republicans have demanded.

Democrats need to flip at least three Senate seats (if they also win the vice presidency) to regain control of the Senate. Recent polls by Public Policy Polling have found at least four Republican incumbent senators trailing Democratic challengers by four or more points, including Sara Gideon leading Sen. Susan Collins 47-43 in Maine, Mark Kelly leading Sen. Martha McSally 47-42 in Arizona, Cal Cunningham leading Sen. Thom Tillis 46-41 in North Carolina and John Hickenlooper leading Sen. Cory Gardner 51-38 in Colorado. Two-term Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, who had earlier ruled out a Senate race when he was running for president, gave Democrats hope March 9 when he launched a challenge of Sen. Steve Daines.

Democrats also are targeting Sen. Jodi Ernst, R-Iowa; an open seat in Kansas, where polarizing vote suppressor Kris Kobach, who lost a governor’s race in 2018, is the likely Republican candidate; two seats in Georgia, where Democrats can be competitive if they manage to stay on voter rolls; and challenges of “Moscow Mitch” McConnell in Kentucky, Lindsey Graham in South Carolina and Sen. John Cornyn in Texas.

Democratic Sen. Doug Jones faces long odds in winning re-election in Trump-loving Alabama, but he might get some help from a seven-candidate Republican primary fight that set up a March 31 runoff between former Sen. Jeff Sessions, who is trying to win back the seat he gave up to disappoint Trump as attorney general, and Tommy Tuberville, the former Auburn football coach who has become a MAGA acolyte and let the first round with 33.39% of the vote, followed by Sessions with 31.65%. Republicans also are targeting Sen. Gary Peters, D-Michigan, who led his Republican challenger by six points in a February Quinnipiac poll.

The Democratic presidential race isn’t over yet — less than half of the states have been heard from —but if the Sanders team wants to overtake Biden they’ll need to do a better job getting their supporters to the polls in the remaining 27 states. And please, don’t say anything you can’t walk back after the nomination is decided. Whichever side wins will need the support of the rival campaign to beat Trump in the fall. — JMC


From The Progressive Populist, April 1, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist
v

Selections from the April 1, 2020 issue

COVER/Marshall Allen Caroline Chen, J. David McSwane and Lexi Churchill, ProPublica
US hospitals say they’re ready for coronavirus. Their infection control violations say otherwise. 


EDITORIAL
Biden rises back to life


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
‘If everyone lit just one little candle ...’


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Poverty and the arts


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Pondering a sick extinction? 


DISPATCHES
You’ll never guess whose people were messing with Florida elections;
Sanders didn’t expand his base;
Republicans resume smearing Hunter Biden;
‘Sanctity of life’ means something different in Alabama;
Pentagon vacancies hit record high;
Trump still sucking up taxpayer dollars from Secret Service;
Anti-choice epublican reality TV star leverages Trump pardon in attempt to unseat John Lewis ...


ART CULLEN
Paltry research funding


ELIZABETH COOK-LYNN
Some are just cons, others are dangerous to democracy


JILL RICHARDSON
Mike Pence is the worst person to lead a coronavirus response


JOHN YOUNG
From Katrina to COVID-19: Governing is no game


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
We are all vulnerable


SAM PIZZIGATI
A simple prescription for a longer life: Equality


TOM CONWAY
An epidemic of insecurity


TOM JOHNSTON
Let’s get real about Medicare for All


JOEL D. JOSEPH
Check Chinese contamination of medical equipment and prescription drugs


DICK POLMAN
Uncle Joe is on top, and that’s no malarkey


JASON SIBERT  Redirect arms spending into affordable housing

GENE NICHOL
Race, again, in North Carolina


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Retroactive denial, or, I changed my mind


SAM URETSKY
B-minus won’t beat an epidemic 


ROBERTO DR. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ
Once again, indigenous census quandry


WAYNE O’LEARY
Searching for the great moderate


JOHN BUELL
Coronavirus and the health of the body politic


SETH SANDRONSKY
Struggling for shelter: Interviewing Dominique Walker


N. GUNASEKARAN
Asia struggles with coronavirus


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
Prejudential black history


ROB PATTERSON
Was boomer music better?


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell
Indies, inclusivity, equality


FRANK LINGO
An open letter to the Holy Father from Frank Lingo


and more ...

Saturday, February 29, 2020

Editorial: Dems Struggle with S-Word

Bernie Sanders had a very good day with the Nevada caucuses Feb. 22 and his success had the anxiety level growing among supporters of the rest of the field, as well as downballot candidates for Congress and state legislative races.

Sanders got 34% of the first vote and 40.5% of the final vote in Nevada caucuses, and he is expected to end up with 24 national delegates from Nevada. Finishing in second place was Joe Biden with 18.9% of the final vote and nine delegates, followed by Pete Buttigieg with 17.3% of the final vote and three delegates. Elizabeth Warren got 11.5% of the vote and no delegates.

Sanders has qualified for 45 national convention delegates so far, of the 100 delegates awarded in the first three states, but 47 states remain to be heard from in the race for the 1,991 delegates needed to win the nomination. More than a third of the national delegates — 1,357 — will be at stake on March 3, “Super Tuesday,” when Democrats in 14 states, including California, Texas and North Carolina, cast their ballots.

After Nevada, the number crunchers at FiveThirtyEight.com forecast that Sanders’ chances of winning a majority of pledged delegates before the convention are 46%. They figure there is a 40% chance no candidate will have clinched the nomination before Milwaukee.

Some Democrats fear Sanders, who calls himself a democratic socialist, will drag down the ticket, particularly when Republicans broadcast videos of Sanders when he visited the Soviet Union on a 1988 bipartisan delegation from Burlington, Vt., when he was mayor; Nicaragua, where he hailed the Sandinista revolution led by Daniel Ortega in 1985, and statements of admiration for some of the accomplishments of the Cuban revolution led by Fidel Castro — which already has stirred Cuban émigrés in Florida. You can bet all will be taken out of context and played on TV and social media 24/7.

Sanders should get ahead of the mudslinging by assuring potential swing voters that he is not a communist, and explaining that his brand of “democratic socialism” is basically a revival of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal economic program that saved American capitalism in 1930s, by regulating corporations to protect workers, small businesses and family farmers and ranchers from unscrupulous plutocrats.

We still think Elizabeth Warren is the better progressive candidate, since she supports much of what Sanders wants to do, and she has avoided the S-word. (She used to be a Republican, but she saw the light in the 1990s when she realized the “free market” wasn’t doing much good for working people. And some people apparently can’t get over the fact that she is a smart, assertive woman with Native American blood.) But Sanders has the movement, and he should declare that he is no more of a radical than FDR, the nation’s only four-term president, who beat the Depression and the Nazis but was written off as a “communist” by the economic royalists of his day. FDR’s protégés were Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom envisioned something like Medicare for All — and when LBJ got the original Medicare enacted in 1965, Ronald Reagan memorably attacked it as “socialist.”

The generation that grew up with the New Deal and fought World War II is dying out, but their children, the Boomers, are now relying on “socialist” programs, such as Medicare and Social Security, to carry them through their retirement years — particularly after Reagan allowed corporate predators in the 1980s to siphon assets from their pensions.

Boomers might find they like the socialism in the Democratic plans to expand Medicare and Social Security benefits, and Democrats should not be shy about noting that Trump has indicated if he is re-elected he will cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security in an attempt to make room for more tax breaks for billionaires. Trump’s Department of Justice also has joined a Republican effort to overturn what remains of the Affordable Care Act, because they just can’t stand that insurance companies are limited in any way from making profits.

If Republicans are going to portray Sanders as a communist, Democrats should portray Trump as a would-be Mussolini who has remade the Republican Party into a fascist cult. Trump seems to be working with another fascist leader — actual former communist Vladimir Putin — to undermine US democratic institutions. Trump even purged his acting director of national intelligence after a member of his staff briefed members of Congress on Russia’s plans to interfere in the US election on behalf of Trump. When Trump found out, he replaced Joseph Maguire, a retired Navy admiral, with Richard Grenell, a Trump loyalist with little intelligence experience.

While a majority of Americans (53%) told a Gallup poll they would not vote for a socialist, that bias has not been reflected in matchup polls so far. CBS News/YouGov poll released Feb. 23 showed Sanders narrowly leading Trump, 47% to 44% in a national poll. Biden led Trump 47-45, Warren narrowly led Trump 46-45, Buttigieg was tied with Trump at 44, Klobuchar was down by one point, 44-45 and Bloomberg was down three, 42-45.

Sanders and the other leading Democratic contenders also show up strong in polls of the key battleground states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which furnished Trump a narrow victory in the Electoral College, but polls in those states have shown net disapproval for Trump.

Sanders led Trump in Michigan by seven points, 48-41, in a University of Wisconsin/Wisconsin State Journal poll released Feb. 23. (All the top Dems were beating Trump in Michigan in that poll.) Sanders led Trump in Wisconsin by two points, 46-44, in the UW/State Journal poll that showed the Democratic contenders within the margin of error. The same poll showed Sanders leading Trump in Pennsylvania by two points, 47-45, Biden ahead by one and Buttigieg, Warren and Klobuchar tied with Trump.

Sanders also was tied with Trump in Florida in a University of North Florida poll released Feb. 20, which also showed Bloomberg leading Trump by six, Biden leading Trump by one and Warren tied with Trump.

It isn’t as if there aren’t plenty of troublesome episodes in Trump’s history that Democrats can remind voters before the election.

Trump is a con man who sold himself for the presidency based on his mythic status as a wheeler dealer and “self-made” billionaire, but the New York Times in October 2018 revealed a pattern of “suspect tax schemes” during the 1990s, “including instances of outright fraud that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents.”

Another Times investigation in May 2019 reported from 1985 to 1994, the president reported more than $1 billion in business losses, and observers suspect he is financially entangled with Russian or Eastern European oligarchs, the Russian government and other shady characters, and that may be why Trump has fought Congress’ demands and subpoenas for his tax returns.

Trump also has loose morals at best. He is known to have cheated on each of his three wives and at least 25 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct since the 1970s. And, of course, the Washington Post’s Fact Checker unit counted 16,241 false or misleading claims in his first three years as president. And that doesn’t even include the 31 lies he told in his State of the Union speech.

Whoever emerges from the struggle at the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee will lbe better than Trump. Fight for your favorite until then, but resolve to vote blue, no matter who. — JMC



From The Progressive Populist, March 15, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist

Selections from the March 15, 2020 issue

COVER/David Cay Johnson
How Nancy Pelosi is forcing Trump and Republicans over a cliff


EDITORIAL
Dems struggle with the S-word


KATHLEEN ERICKSON
Lessons from ministering on the border


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Michael Milken: Could it happen again?


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Drifting poisons cause damage


DISPATCHES
Trump aides continue purge of ‘disloyal’ government officials;
Trump incompetence and cuts to health infrastructure are threats to nation’s health;
Dems did something big on controlling drug costs, but nobody is paying attention;
Affordable Care Act never more popular, but public option more popular;
Judge orders Georgia to disclose voter purge records;
Trump budget proposal attacks Postal Service;
Some polls just don't look right ...


ART CULLEN
Democrats are reaching farmers with an exciting message: Green agriculture


ADAM TURTLE
What is at risk from climate change and what we can do now


JILL RICHARDSON
A broken promise to teachers and nonprofit workers


JOHN YOUNG
‘Tick-tock,’ says the Trump corruption clock


BOB BURNETT
Who can beat Trump?


TOM PALLEY
Bernie Sanders: Nothing to fear except fear itself


TOM CONWAY
Facing retirement with fear


SAM PIZZIGATI
Living in inequality, dying in despair


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
They’ve come for the immigrants. We’re next


PETER CERTO  
Who’s afraid of ‘Socialism’?

MICHAEL WINSHIP
It’s happening here ...


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Long-term care needs attention before you need it


SAM URETSKY
What’s in a name for Coronavirus? 


WAYNE O’LEARY
America’s new Cold Civil War


JOHN BUELL
Trump’s economy neglects the workplace


JOEL D. JOSEPH
President Trump had no right to fire Lt. Col. Vindman


OLIVIA ALPERSTEIN
We need to treat nuclear war like the emergency it is


ROBERTO DR. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ
Believing/not believing in the US political system


BOOK REVIEW/Seth Sandronsky
Globalize this


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
Power to the people


ROB PATTERSON
Breaking Bad coming and going


GENE NICHOL
Trump and Roger Williams


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell
Kahlo’s lives, loves and leftist politics


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
Thumper in chief


ADAM-TROY CASTRO
Why do liberals think all Trump supporters are stupid? 


Friday, February 21, 2020

Saturday, February 15, 2020

Editorial: Snap Out of It, Dems!

After Republican senators “acquitted” Donald Trump on the impeachment charges that he abused his power in seeking political favors from the president of Ukraine and that he obstructed Congress’ attempts to investigate his actions, the ImPOTUS embarked on a revenge tour that got many Democrats panicking that the impeachment effort had backfired.

The panic increased when Gallup reported that a poll found Trump’s job approval at 49%, a personal best.

Our advice channels Cher, slapping the face of her addled suitor in the movie “Moonstruck” and demanding, “Snap out of it!”

Trump and his Republican enablers rely on bluff and bluster, and the the Gallup poll is likely an outlier, even as the 42% approval it showed among independents is closer to other polls. Trump has not had net approval in the average of public opinion polls at FiveThirtyEight.com since a month after his election. The average on Feb. 11 stood at 43.8% approval and 51.9% disapproval. And polls are in the Democrats’ favor in a dozen potential swing states … if the Dems can get their act together.

So Trump will remain in the White House at least through the election. This shouldn’t be a surprise to observers of the impeachment process, whether you’re on the left, the right or the middle. Now there is second-guessing of the House leadership’s decision to limit the impeachment articles to articles pertaining to Trump’s abuse of power in his attempt to coerce Ukraine’s new president to order an investigation of Hunter Biden, in order to damage Joe Biden’s chances of challenging Trump’s re-election, and Trump’s obstruction of the House’s attempts to investigate that abuse of power.

Personally, we wish the House had thrown in impeachment articles pertaining to Trump’s obstruction of Robert Mueller’s investigation into the involvement of the Russian government and Eastern European oligarchs in Trump’s campaign for president and Trump’s violation of federal campaign law in ordering Michael Cohen to pay porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep her quiet about her affair with Trump in 2006 while Melania was caring for their infant son, Barron. (That made Melania the third wife Trump has cheated on.)

But House leaders wanted to keep the impeachment simple, and they had solid evidence with the partial transcript of Trump’s phone call to Ukrainian President Volodmyr Zelensky, during which Trump asked him for the political favor in exchange for freeing $400 million Congress had appropriated to the Ukraine to combat Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. Bill Taylor, the Trump administration’s top diplomat to Ukraine, also testified he was told US military aid to Ukraine and a Trump-Zelensky White House meeting were conditioned on Zelensky publicly announcing investigations into the Bidens and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 US elections. Gordon Sondland, Trump’s ambassador to the European Union, also testified he worked with Rudy Giuliani at Trump’s “express direction” to arrange a “quid pro quo” with the Ukraine government.

House managers did a good job laying out the facts for the Senate, but the jury was fixed from the word go. The House managers needed to convince at least 20 Republican senators that Trump’s abuses warranted his removal from office — but they couldn’t get four Republican senators they needed to join with the Dems to call witnesses the White House had forbidden to testify to House investigators. With Majority Leader “Moscow Mitch” McConnell admitting he was coordinating with Trump’s defense team, Republicans voted in lockstep to deny subpoenas for new witnesses, ignoring the 75% of Americans who wanted the Senate to call witnesses. On the last day of debate, only Mitt Romney and Susan Collins voted for a final motion to subpoena John Bolton, some other witnesses and documents.

One of the senators who appeared to have nothing to lose was Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., who is not seeking re-election. But he became a profile in discourage when he acknowledged Trump’s behavior was “inappropriate,” but not enough to remove him from office. Instead, he said, voters should decide whether Trump should remain in office. And he didn’t need to hear any witnesses. “There is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense,” Alexander said. Mind closed.

On Feb. 4, even before his acquittal, Trump arrived for his State of the Union speech in the House Chamber, snubbed an attempted handshake from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and delivered a dog-and-pony show containing at least 31 false or misleading statements. At the end, as he basked in applause from the GOP half of the chamber, Pelosi pointedly tore her copy of the speech in half, later saying, “I tore up a manifesto of mistruths.” She added, “It was necessary to get the attention of the American people to say, ‘This is not true. And this is how it affects you’. And I don’t need any lessons from anyone, especially the President of the US, about dignity.”

Later, Trump said Pelosi might be prosecuted for destroying a government document, but legal experts noted that was nonsense, since it was merely a photocopy of a speech. And, if it really was a document, couldn’t Trump be impeached for making false statements in a federal document? That’s yet another felony Attorney Bill Barr will keep a lid on.

The next day, when the Senate actually voted 52-48 to keep Trump in his office, with only Romney voting to remove Trump, many of the Republican senators said they believed Trump had learned his lesson. But the next day he kicked aside that pretense, taking the opportunity at the National Prayer Breakfast to repudiate keynote speaker Arthur Brooks’ call for forgiveness and humility. Instead, he told attendees his political opponents are “dishonest and corrupt people” and that God is on the side of his supporters. He made implicit references to Romney and to Pelosi, who has said in the past that she prays for the president — and was on the dais. “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong,” Trump said. “Nor do I like people who say, ‘I pray for you,’ when they know that that’s not so. So many people have been hurt, and we can’t let that go on.”

Later that day, Trump not only fired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from his National Security Council job, in apparent retaliation for Vindman’s testimony, but to add insult to injury, Vindman and his twin brother, Yevgeny, who also worked for the NSC and was fired, were escorted off the White House grounds. Trump also fired Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland. Because who’s going to stop him?

Despite being acquitted by Republicans in the Senate’s sham trial, Trump has not been cleared of wrongdoing in the eyes of Americans. A Quinnipiac poll released Feb. 10 found 55% of respondents said Trump has not been exonerated, and independents agreed, with 54% saying Trump has not been cleared, though 40% said, yeah, Trump is innocent of wrongdoing.

Voters must pass their own judgment, not only on Trump, but also on Republican senators who have made themselves accomplices to the Great Misleader’s abuse of power. — JMC



From The Progressive Populist, March 1, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist

Selections from the March 1, 2020 issue

COVER/Hal Crowther
Voiding the social contract: Trump’s war of the weird


EDITORIAL
Snap out of it, Dems!


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Food servers: Their times and troubles


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Don’t throw the personal campaigning out with the caucuses


DISPATCHES
Reneging on pledges (again), Trump would cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security to pay for tax cuts for rich;
Trump Medicaid rules would undermine rural health care;
Iowa caucuses slowly serve their purpose;
Plenty of Republican Senate targets;
Trump still ‘underwater’ in swing states;
Barr confirms he'll process Giuliani's anti-Biden claims;
Trump job creation still lags Obama’s last three years;
Trump makes taxpayers pay nearly $500,000 for Secret Service stays at president's properties;
Trump threatens to pardon Roger Stonne before dirty trickster is sentenced;
New data shows Texas' working class supports progessive economic policies;
'End Citizens United' and 'Let America Vote' join foces for combined voting rights group


ART CULLEN
Iowa results seem to fall where everyone expected they would: Undecided


JAMES EGGERT
When Democrats vote ...


JILL RICHARDSON
A cruel attack on the disabled


JOHN YOUNG
Donald Trump: Loser


NANCY J. ALTMAN
Trump is a brazen liar about Social Security


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet 
Election-year pessimism


TOM CONWAY
Trump gets an F from workers


TOM JOHNSTON
Clarifying prospects for US health care


MICHAEL WINSHIP
Donald Trump’s state of the mighty me


ROBERTO DR. CINTLI RODRIGUEZ 
The end of truth: The triumph of lying


BOB BURNETT
This is the way it ends, not with a bang but a whimper


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas 
The Fabulist-in-Chief takes on cancer


SAM URETSKY
Who can you trust in a liar’s world


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
What will it take?


WAYNE O’LEARY
Democrats, post-feud


JOHN BUELL
California fires and the search for home


MARK ANDERSON
Can Britain and EU disentangle


DAVID SCHMIDT
Crossing the border between reality and fantasy: The wild inaccuracies of ‘American Dirt’


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel 
The toil and trouble of our time


ROB PATTERSON
Scorsese brings us along on his journeys


SETH SANDRONSKY
Mourning in America: Kobe and me


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell 
#OscarsSoWhite meets #OscarsSoConservative


FRANK LINGO
Butterfly protectors join toll of murdered environmentalists

and more ...

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Saturday, January 25, 2020

Editorial: No Time for Dem Schism

With the Iowa caucuses on the horizon, it’s the time the serious slashing starts, as the candidates desperately seek an advantage in a tight race. Folks will gather in schools, churches, living rooms and other meeting places across Iowa the evening of Feb. 3 to stand up for their candidates.

More than two dozen candidates exercised their presidential ambitions in the past year and many of them already have withdrawn from the fray. Iowans will start the process of cutting down those ranks to three or four solid candidates who will go on to New Hampshire for the Feb. 11 primary, followed by Nevada caucuses Feb. 22 and South Carolina’s Feb. 29 primary.

After that comes “Super Tuesday” on March 3, when primaries in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Democrats Abroad, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Virginia, plus caucuses in American Samoa, could well determine the nominee.

With that front-loading of delegate selection, it’s no wonder Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren started attacking each other, with the Sanders campaign putting out the word that Warren was the candidate of the elites and wouldn’t expand the base while Warren complained that Sanders told her a woman couldn’t get elected president.

Democrats shouldn’t get distracted by this controversy, which was stoked by CNN during the Jan. 14 debate in Des Moines. Warren said Sanders made the statement and Sanders denies it. It’s possible both candidates are telling the truth, according to their memories of what was said. In the absence of tapes, we’ll never know for sure, and it doesn’t make a great deal of difference. We do know Hillary Clinton got three million more votes than Donald Trump in 2016, and she lost only because voter suppression efforts in Detroit and Flint, Mich., and Milwaukee, Wis., along with Clinton’s failure to campaign in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the closing days of the 2016 campaign let Trump creep through to victory by a margin of less than 80,000 votes in those three states, which gave him the win in the Electoral College.

It’s an old rule that the only way to run in an election is scared, and that applies to Democrats picking a candidate to oust Trump, but there is no need to panic when you remember that Trump won’t sneak up on us this time. In 2016, Trump drew to an inside straight and won, with the help of his Russian enablers who skillfully manipulated FaceBook, WikiLeaks and other social media. But we won’t get fooled again. Trump played an economic populist in 2016 and he made all sorts of promises about protecting American jobs, particularly in steel mills and coal mines, but all he’s really done is produce tax cuts for corporate bosses and shareholders while he cut regulations for polluters and made it more difficult for citizens to hold corporate scofflaws accountable.

Trump has been disapproved by more than half of potential voters in FiveThirtyEight’s average of polls since mid-March 2017, with 53.4% disapproval and 42.2% approval as of Jan. 21. And there’s little good news for Trump in the battleground states. As of Dec. 31, even with a relatively good economy, Trump was “underwater,” with greater disapproval than approval, in Morning Consult tracking polls in at least nine states he carried in 2016: He is underwater in Alaska by two points, Arizona by three points, Florida by one point, Georgia by two points, Iowa by nine points, Michigan by 15 points, Ohio by four points, Pennsylvania by five points and Wisconsin by nine points. And he was tied, 48-48, in Texas and North Carolina. If Trump has to campaign in Texas, it’s good news for Democrats in other swing states. That means Republicans must keep Democrats from voting.

Pundits have warned, without much evidence, that Sanders and Warren are too far left for the electorate. But their proposals to expand Medicare to cover everybody — which was the original plan when Medicare was created in 1965 — is still pretty popular, particularly while Trump and the Republicans have been aggressively trying to abolish the Affordable Care Act and gut the guaranteed coverage of pre-existing medical conditions.

Polls show Sanders and Warren are competitive with Trump in battleground states. A Marquette Law School poll of registered voters in Wisconsin, released Jan. 15, found Joe Biden leading Trump 49-45, Sanders leading 47-45 and Warren trailing Trump 48-45. Warren’s gap was within the 4.1% margin of error, but she also led Trump 44-42 in the Jan. 8 Fox News poll in Wisconsin (which also was within the margin of error).

An EPIC/MRA poll in Michigan released Jan. 15 showed Biden, Sanders and Warren leading Trump by 6, 5 and 3 points, respectively. A Florida Atlantic University poll in Florida released Jan. 15 showed Biden, Sanders and Warren leading Trump by 2, 6 and 2 points, respectively.

Progressive Democrats must make a hard choice between Sanders, who has been a progressive stalwart for decades, and Warren, a former Republican from Oklahoma who began to vote Democratic in 1995 because she believed the Republican Party was tilting the playing field in favor of large financial institutions and against middle-class American families.

While Trump and the Republicans will engage in character assassination against whoever ends up with the nomination, they’re undoubtedly eager to target Sanders, who got comparatively gentle treatment in 2016 from the media and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Geoffrey Kabaservice, a center-right activist, wrote in The Guardian Jan. 16 that he got a glimpse of the Republican opposition research book on Sanders, “which was so massive it had to be transported on a cart.” Newsweek reporter Kurt Eichenwald, who got to see some of its contents, declared in 2016 that “it was brutal. The Republicans would have torn [Sanders] apart.”

According to Eichenwald, the book includes damning material such as the fact that Sanders was on unemployment until his mid-30s, that he co-sponsored a bill to ship Vermont’s nuclear waste to Texas where it would be dumped in a poor Hispanic community, that he honeymooned in the Soviet Union, and that he appeared at a 1985 rally in Nicaragua at which Sandinista supporters chanted “Here, there, everywhere / the Yankee will die,’’ while President Daniel Ortega condemned “state terrorism” by America. Sanders said, on camera, supporting the Sandinistas was “patriotic.” Then there’s Sanders’ fictional 1972 essay he wrote for an alternative newspaper in Vermont in which he described a woman fantasizing being raped by three men.

Unfair? Distorted? Taken out of context? You can count on it. And Trump will have plenty of money and Fox “News” to smear Sanders 24/7. Instead, let Bernie be our Moses.

All Trump has on Warren is that she has Native American ancestry, enough that her grandparents had to elope because her grandfather’s family objected, but there’s not enough Indian blood for her to qualify for tribal casino profits. And she wants to expand Medicare to cover everybody, paid by billionaires and corporations.

We believe that, once Democrats unify, Warren can beat Trump in the swing states, and she will pursue progressive populist policies as president. If she doesn’t win the nomination, we are confident Warren will support Sanders, or Biden, or whoever wins the Democratic nomination, and so will we, because none of us can risk giving Trump four more years to abuse presidential power. Nobody can afford to sit out the election this year. — JMC



From The Progressive Populist, February 15, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the February 15, 2020 issue

COVER/Maanyi Singh
Water crisis in cities worsens already terrible inequality


EDITORIAL
No time for Democratic schism


FRANK LINGO
Interview with Lucifer


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
State republicans and their comfort zones


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen 
Genetically modified impossible burgers are trouble


DISPATCHES
The last thing Republicans want is a fair trial on impeachment;
Expert: Ga. election server showed signs of tampering;
Moscow Mitch blows off latest Russian hacking news, says we’ve done enough to protect the election;
Medicare for All is not a pipe dream;
Inflation adjusted wages rose 0% in 2019, 51% got no raises;
Vast majority of Americans say US economic system unfiarly benefits the powerful;
Sciff says NSA, CIA withhold documents from Congress, including those relevant to impeachment;
Trump legal team: what happens 'when you don't pay your legal bills':
Food & Water Action says US=Mexico-Canada Agreement is bad for climate and food safety;
Lev Parnas worked his way into Trump's world — and is now rattling it ...


ART CULLEN
Iowa says we’ll let you know when we decide


BEN LILLISTON
Cory Booker’s halt on factory farms would help the climate


JILL RICHARDSON
Why do we have school lunch debt at all?


JOHN YOUNG
Standing around oblivious to flames


MARK ANDERSON 
As the wells run dry, so does democracy


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet 
Assassination nation


JOEL D. JOSEPH
President Trump’s appointment of Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner violates federal law


BOB BURNETT
2000-2019: What hath the internet wrought?


ROGER BYBEE
Centrist dems, pundits use insurers’ key words against Medicare for All


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas 
Think locally: The health mantra for 2020


SAM URETSKY
Issues will drive the democratic vote


SAM PIZZIGATI
Are America’s rich getting tired of winning?


WAYNE O’LEARY
Here’s to your health (or not)


JOHN BUELL
Financing post secondary education — for all


SETH SANDRONSKY
Job quality index says economy has a way to go


JOSEPH B. ATKINS
US interference in foreign affairs is business as usual


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
Let the bodies hit the floor


ROB PATTERSON  Well-told detective tales

GENE NICHOL
A broken university


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell 
Estranged bedfellows: What the FOX is going on? 


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson 
So long, dear dotard


and more ...

Saturday, January 11, 2020

Editorial: Making a Martyr in Iran

Donald Trump’s decision to assassinate Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in a drone strike at Baghdad International Airport managed to undermine the popular unrest in Iran and in Iraq to Iran-leaning Iraqi leaders.

Trump claimed Soleimani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, was killed because he was planning large-scale attacks against American diplomatic and military personnel. But Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi told the parliament that Trump asked Abdul-Mahdi to mediate the dispute between the US and Iran and Soleimani arrived in Baghdad on a commercial flight Jan. 2 and went through passport control with his diplomatic passport to meet with Abdul-Mahdi to discuss peace prospects. Luckily, Abdul-Mahdi didn’t meet Soleimani at the airport, but Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis went out to welcome the general, so he and eight other passengers also died in the fiery blast.

Juan Cole noted that the lack of security at the US embassy, which allowed the grounds to be invaded by thousands of Iraqi protesters Dec. 31, undermined claims that there were substantial threats against American targets. “If they thought there was a dire such threat in the offing, wouldn’t they have sent in some Marines? Only after they received a stronger than expected reaction to their assassination campaign did they finally take the security of the embassy seriously.”

Trump has been expected to pick a fight with Iran ever since he got in the Oval Office. He is known to project his ambitions on his rivals, and in 2011 and 2012, he repeatedly claimed that Barack Obama would start a war with Iran in order to get re-elected. Of course, Obama managed to win re-election without mixing it up with Iran. But with Trump’s job approval stuck in the low 40s while disapproval has hovered in the 52 to 54 percent range the past year — and a narrow pluality of voters favoring his removal from office — the ImPOTUS is hoping the rally-round-the-flag move will turn his misfortunes around.

Defenders of the drone strike say Soleimani is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of US military and contractors in Iraq, so we are well rid of him. But Trump took a charismatic special forces commander and made him a martyr. Hundreds of thousands of Iranians and Iraqis came out into the streets Jan. 3 to mourn the martyr and reprise the chant, “Death to America.”

Cole noted that young protesters in downtown Baghdad and other cities initially broke into happy dances when they heard Soleimani had been murdered, since he was plotting to repress them. But a day later they were chanting against both Iranian and US presence in Iraq. Shiites who had come to resent Iranian influence in Iraq made an abrupt about-face. In Karbala, where the Iranian consulate was recently torched, an enormous crowd mourned Soleimani as a martyr. There are also large numbers of Shiites in Iraq, Pakistan and India. And it might take a generation or more before Iranians will take a peace overture from America seriously.

How did Soleimani get his murderous reputation? The Department of Defense says Iran-backed Shiite militias, which Soleimani helped train and supply, were responsible for deaths of 603 US troops in Iraq from 2003 to 2011. But most of those deaths occurred during the surge in Iraq, when President George W. Bush pushed thousands of US troops into the country to deal with the sectarian civil war between Shiite and Sunni groups after Saddam Hussein was ousted. The last big burst was in June 2011, as US forces were withdrawing from Iraq, Iranian-backed militants launched rocket attacks on American bases that killed more than a dozen US soldiers, Colin Kahl, a former national security adviser for Vice President Joe Biden, wrote for Foreign Policy. The Obama administration had two options for retaliating: a strike inside Iran that would kill Iranian operatives or unilateral special operations forces raids in Iraq against the militia rocket teams. To head off an escalation to a wider war with Iran, the administration chose the latter.

But the Obama administration also pursued a multinational deal with Iran to stop its development of a nuclear weapon, in exchange for easing sanctions that were strangling Iran’s economy.

The deal, which was reached in 2015 and was approved by the United Nations Security Council, was successful in stopping Iran’s nuclear arms race, according to UN nuclear arms inspectors.

But Trump could not abide Obama’s diplomatic achievement, so one of the first things the Great Misleader did when he took office was to unilaterally renege on the deal. He put economic sanctions back in place against Iran and threatened sanctions against other nations, including NATO allies, who were signatories to the deal if they continued to honor it.

Since good behavior was not rewarded, what was Iran’s recourse? They brought out the rockets and improvised explosive devices and handed them to their affiliates in Iraq, which led to the Dec. 27 rocket attacks on American bases in Iraq.

Iran also has announced it will no longer abide by the limits imposed by the 2015 nuclear deal, Iraq’s Shiite majority parties in parliament have urged their leaders to expel US troops from Iraq and the US-led coalition announced it was suspending its operations against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. And if Soleimani left behind any big plans to attack American targets, his successors still have the plans and plenty of motivation. Heck of a week for Trump.

Candidates, On Your Marks

As the Iowa caucuses approach on Feb. 3, it’s time to get real about picking the Democratic nominee for president. There field is halved from the 28 who expressed presidential aspirations, but several great candidates remain in the hunt, any of whom would be preferable to Donald J. Trump.

After Iowa, the New Hampshire primary is Feb. 11, Nevada caucuses are Feb. 22, South Carolinda’s primary is Feb. 29 and the race could be practically decided on Super Tuesday, March 3, when primaries will be held in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Democrats Abroad, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Virginia are held, and American Samoa will caucus.

Our preferences come down to the two progressive populist candidates: Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. They have managed to raise funds while taking aim at corporate greed and promoting legislation that would improve the lives of working families.

Some pundits say Sanders and Warren are too far left to win the election, but they share an ambition to expand Medicare to cover everybody, which is popular among the electorate at large and will only become more popular if Republicans succeed in getting the Supreme Court to overturn the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare.

Don’t let Trump supporters’ bravado scare you. Trump is a phenomenally unpopular president whose ratings have been a net negative since a month after he took office. Polls show Biden, Sanders and Warren can beat Trump. If that is the case, you might as well vote for the candidate whose platform appeals most to your progressive values. Just don’t say anything about the other candidates that you can’t walk back later if your candidate doesn’t win the nomination. Resolve to vote blue, no matter who. — JMC



From The Progressive Populist, February 1, 2020

Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 The Progressive Populist


Selections from the February 1, 2020 issue

COVER/John Vidal
The lost decade: How we awoke to climate change only to squander every chance to act


EDITORIAL
Making a martyr; Candidates, on your marks

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

DON ROLLINS
Sallie McFague remembered


RURAL ROUTES/Margot McMillen
Grade presidential candidates on farm and food issues


DISPATCHES
Explosive report indicates Trump loans from Deutsche Bank were backed by Russia;
Trump tipped off Mar-a-Lago pals to expect ‘big’ Iran action;
Trump claims tweets are sufficient notice to Congess that US may strike Iran;
Trump threats against Iranian sites raise potential of war crimes;
Iranian general killed by Trump may have been working on peace deal;
Trump stil ‘underwater’ in key battleground states;
Pence claims Iran ties to 9/11 attacks;
Dem trying to flip Graham’s Senate seat reports record haul;
Iranian Americans, returning home from Canada, detained, interrogated by Border agents ...


ART CULLEN
The last bus stops in Iowa on Feb. 3


NORMAN SOLOMON
Progressives need a united front for Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren


JILL RICHARDSON
The Education Department is ripping off defrauded students


JOHN YOUNG
Happy New Year from the conserva-myth party


GRASSROOTS/Hank Kalet
Greider told the people


TOM JOHNSTON
Democrats can win the Medicare for All debate and the 2020 elections


N. GUNASEKARAN
Trade war was deadly to Asia’s poor


MICHAEL WINSHIP
In Trump world, fiction is just as strange as truth


KARL GROSSMAN
Trump gets Space Force to assert domination


BOB BURNETT
2019: Ten reasons to be thankful


HEALTH CARE/Joan Retsinas
Scrooge lives: A new chapter if the history of food stamps


SAM URETSKY
Trump followers living in another world


SETH SANDRONSKY
Business and the rising minimum wage


WAYNE O’LEARY
The trouble with Obamacare


JOHN BUELL
Australia: The fire this time


SATIRE/Rosie Sorenson
“Dreaming of a White Christmas,” as sung by Kim Jong Un


KENT PATERSON
Who really rules El Paso? 


ROB PATTERSON
OK, so Quentin Tarantino has some talent ...


BOOK REVIEW/Heather Seggel
When the narrative gets kidnapped


MOVIE REVIEW/Ed Rampell
Terrence Malick’s A Hidden Life is an anti-war triumph


GENE NICHOL
Trump’s economic cruelty


and more ...