What could
be more innocent and more reflective of basic American values than a program
that encourages school children to have lunch with kids with whom they usually
don’t associate? It’s a wonderful way to
encourage children to learn about people outside their small circle of friends,
who might from a different ethnic or economic background, or maybe even have a
disability.
This
national program is called Mix It Up at Lunch Day and is sponsored by the
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a long-time civil rights organization known
primarily for its work on behalf of African-Americans, but which in recent
years has gotten involved in rights issues for gays, immigrants and others. According to SPLC, Mix It Up “encourages students across the nation to challenge and cross social
and racial boundaries by sitting with someone new in the cafeteria for just one
day.” SPLC says that more than one million students
across the nation took part in Mix It Up last year.
It reminds
me of the middle school my son attended, which assigned kids to lunch tables
and changed the assignments every six weeks. By the end of the year, every
child had sat at lunch with every other child in his or her grade, a great way
to slow down the formation of cliques.
Mix it Up
at Lunch Day sounds like an idea that everyone from all points of the political
spectrum can get behind.
But not the
ultra- right-wing American Family Association (AFA), which has launched a
campaign to have parents keep their children home from school on this year’s
Mix It Up day, set for October 30.
What could AFA’s
objection possibly be?
As
reported in the New York Times, AFA claims that the event is “a
nationwide push to promote the homosexual lifestyle in America.”
The Times gives us this
quote from Bryan Fisher, who works for AFA: “Anti-bullying
legislation is exactly the same,” Mr. Fischer said. “It’s just another thinly
veiled attempt to promote the homosexual agenda. No one is in favor of anyone
getting bullied for any reason, but these anti-bullying policies become a
mechanism for punishing Christian students who believe that homosexual behavior
is not something that should be normalized.”
The only way that this statement makes any sense is if Fisher is
saying that AFA dislikes Mix It Up and anti-bullying policies because both
discourage kids from beating up gays. What else could AFA possibly mean by
“punishing Christian students who believe that homosexual behavior shouldn't be
normalized” in the context of anti-bullying initiatives?
Beyond this convoluted justification for literally bashing GLBT
students, is the illogical inference that Mix It Up has a special gay agenda. There
is no special mention of GLBT as a group in the Mix It Up material I saw, and
quite a lot about racial and ethnic groups like African-Americans and Latinos.
I also saw an emphasis on encouraging kids from different socioeconomic groups
to get together. There can be no doubt that Mix It Up is meant to include
people of differing sexual orientations (as it should), but their inclusion is
not explicitly stated. To say that the program has a special gay orientation is
nothing more than a lie.
Moreover, Mix It Up promotes tolerance for differences—be it
racial, social, sexual, whatever—does nothing to promote any given lifestyle or
ethnic group.
What’s more, most people would only connect SPLC with the civil
rights movement for African-Americans.
I understand that the AFA boycott may partially be in retaliation for
SPLC putting the right-wing group on its list of hate groups. So maybe, all we
have here is a tit-for-tat maneuver that is unfortunately based on a big lie
and AFA’s ugly viewpoint regarding sexual minorities.
That’s pretty bad in and of itself, but I keep having this gnawing
feeling that something else is going on.
Let’s add one and one together: The first one is the fact that Mix It Up
Day focuses on race and ethnicity. The second one is the fact that SPLC is
known for its stand on race issues. When I add those two “ones” together, the
two I get is that behind the attack on gays by AFA is a veiled racist attack
against minorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment