Mark Twain would have changed the names and turned it into a
hilarious short story: A charlatan physician interviews a charlatan businessman
about his health.
For that’s what we’re talking about in the Mehmet Oz
interview of Donald Trump. Oz, a medical doctor, has a television show on which
he often touts unproved therapies and products, some of which he has a
financial interest in. His current Wikipedia article notes “A
study published in the British Medical Journal on the effectiveness of Oz's
medical advice found that 51 percent of his recommendations had no scientific backing
and rationale, or in some cases contradicted scientific evidence.”
Much has been written about Donald Trump’s business
quackery, but let’s do a brief review: Four bankruptcies leaving investors
holding the bag. 3,500 lawsuits, many of which are for bills he hasn’t paid.
His many failed branding ventures, including Trump steaks, vodka, airlines, mortgage
broker, magazine, water, game and university, plus a professional football team.
The low return on his investments over time, much lower than what he would have
made if he had invested passively in the stock market using funds that track
stock indices. The criminal actions filed against Trump University and the
investigation into the Trump Foundation that have revealed real wrong-doing
(unlike the various investigations of Hillary and the Clinton Foundation, which
have found nothing illegal or unethical).
A bogus doc and a bogus moneymaker. But on TV, Oz plays a
successful physician and Trump plays a successful businessman.
In The Adventures of Huckleberry
Finn, Huckleberry and the runaway slave Jim meet two conmen in their
travels, one of whom claims to be a Duke, the other of whom claims to be a
King. Much of the book, often cited as the greatest of all American novels (I
favor Catch 22), details the various
cons the Duke and King play on the residents of small towns along the
Mississippi.
Oz and Trump. The Duke and the King. It would make a
wonderful satire, but as a real life event, it is tragic.
Oz must have gone to the Matt Lauer School of Autocrat Adulation,
because he was at least as sycophantic and obsequious towards the Donald as
Lauer had been during the Commander in Chief Forum. Although Donald Trump’s
body mass index of just over 30 qualifies as obese, Oz said that Trumpty-Dumpty
was “slightly overweight.” Why Oz felt that toadying to a narcissistic blowhard
running for president was more important than reminding his audience of the
problem of obesity in America will remain a mystery to all but Oz and his
financial advisors. It was a shameful moment for a physician, but then again,
no more shameful than supporting psychic communication with the dead, devoting
a show to reparative therapy for gays and calling green coffee extract a
miracle, all of which Oz has done.
I thought that Matt Lauer had asked the easiest, most
friendly question in the history of the American news media when he inquired of
the Donald whether he was studying foreign affairs to learn more. But Oz
managed to throw an even slower, easier pitch to hit when he asked Trumpty-Dumpty,
“When you look into the mirror what do you see?” Trump evidently has some uncorrected visual
difficulties because he looked past the gray at his temples, the crow’s feet,
the double chin and the 60 pounds of extra padding and said he sees a 35-year-old
man.
Like Lauer, Oz avoided the tough questions. Trump has
released his recent medical test results, including the results of a
testosterone test. That he took such a test should have been a red flag to Oz.
Testosterone tests are not a routine part of an annual physical and are not and
have never been recommended by any medical association for a healthy person
without a particular set of symptoms.
WebMD lists the following reasons to conduct a testosterone
test on an adult male:
·
Check a
man's sexual problems. Having a low level of testosterone
may lower a man's sex drive or not
allow him to have an erection (erectile dysfunction).
The release of testosterone test results provides highly
circumstantial evidence that we did not get a complete list of the medicines Trumpty-Dumpty
regularly takes. But Oz did not ask anything about the oddness of a healthy man
with no complaints having this test.
Even Oz’s kid glove treatment would not have prevented the
Donald from doing severe damage to his campaign and self-image if the producers
had not edited the show. Missing in the version that aired on television is a
creepy incident that will make you want to jump in the shower and wash off the
filth immediately. At a certain point, the good daughter Ivanka appears and
Donald gives her a kiss. Oz gushes sentimentally that “It’s nice to see a
father kiss his daughter.” Trumps proudly trumpets that, “I try to kiss her as
much as possible.” Sick, creepy, and reminiscent of Trump’s other disturbing
comments about having an incestuous relationship with his oldest daughter. But
most people will never know because Oz and/or his handlers cut it out. We wouldn’t
want to point out that the emperor is naked, would we?
The quack’s interview of the creepy conman vied with a
number of stories about the election as the top news of the day, including
(using the front section of the New York
Times):
·
Trump still refuses to admit president Obama was
born in the United States.
·
Trump vows to create 25 million jobs over 10
years (but gives no details).
·
A Times/CBS
poll about voter attitudes, finding voters say Trump lacks the temperament to
be president, but is a transformative figure.
·
Trump releases a new letter from his doctor
(talk about creepy and quacky!).
·
Democrats make a strategy adjustment as the race
tightens, deciding to go after Stein and Johnson supporters.
·
Hillary Clinton returns to the campaign trail.
As a former news writer, field producer and on-air reporter,
I have a very strong opinion about what should have been the lead story of the
day: At a speech in front of a Latino organization, Hillary laid out in detail
her immigration plan and stated explicitly that she wants to give illegal
immigrants a path to citizenship.
A Google News search uncovered zero stories about Hillary’s
bold and beautiful immigration plan, nor on the impassioned and inspirational
speech she gave. Of course, any reporter who saw the speech could no longer be
able to say or write with a straight face that Hillary is distant, doesn’t
connect with people, doesn’t smile, has no empathy and all the other crap
reporters like to say to denigrate Hillary’s style, statements of value that would
never be applied to her if she were a he.
Her speech was a perfect platform for a media outlet to
contrast the immigration policies of the two candidates. Hillary wants a road
to citizenship, Trump wants a wall. Such a story might even bring up the fact
that illegal immigration is down so much that at this point more illegals are
returning to their former countries than sneaking into the United States, thus
negating the panic that Trumpty-Dumpty wants to instill in the American people.
Day after day, the mainstream news media fail to question
Trump’s lies; create false equivalencies between the trustworthiness of the
candidate who lied the least in the current election cycle and the one who has
lied the most in history; focus on personalities instead of issues; create a
false narrative about Hillary’s health and trust-worthiness; and spend way more
time and space trying to find something wrong in her emails than reporting all
the wrong in the dealings of the Trump organization, university and Foundation.
The public sees the constant hammering of Clinton and they never learn the full
extent of Trump’s lies and lunacy. What should have been a landslide is turning
into a close race, and it’s all the fault of the mainstream news media.
Why is the media easy on Trumpty-Dumpty and hard on Hillary?
I have developed several theories and read of others to explain the media’s
double standard: 1) A close race and a focus on the buffoon Trump is good for
ratings. 2) The news media and the wealthy industrialists who own and control
them fear or dislike Clinton. 3) They’re trying to “thread the needle,” which
means make the race close enough that the Democrats don’t take back the Senate
and win the House. 4) Reporters and editors, who so cleverly could find ways to
support Bush II in 2000, the Iraq War at its inception, the Tea Party and the
absolutely false notion that you solve a recession by balancing the federal budget, suddenly are helpless in dealing with a lying
buffoon. 5) They really don’t want a woman to be president. 6) There may
even be a class system explanation: that the news media always tend to like the
candidate who was born to the manor, or the closest to it of the candidates.
Frankly, I still think it comes down to keeping taxes low
for the wealthy. The wealthy elite who own and control most of the news media
would rather risk giving the country over to a trigger-happy, sociopathic,
racist, mendacious crook who has failed at everything he ever did that did not
exclusively include self-promotion than to see their taxes go up.
So sorry for hear that. If you want to know more about the infertility then you can visit to our website. In this page you will get know more about the process of male infertility.
ReplyDelete