On the surface it seems inconsistent that the same country,
Germany, that submitted Greece to such harsh punishment is opening its arms so
generously to Syrian refugees, agreeing to take as many as 800,000, or one
percent of its own population.
But it makes perfect sense once you accept that a deeply
Protestant—perhaps Lutheran—streak still runs through Germany and its politics
and foreign policy. It’s the peculiar Protestantism of the capitalist class
that Max Weber defined in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism in 1905. To the
capitalist following the Protestant ethic, the Greeks and their government committed
the ultimate of all sins—they did not meet their obligations. Imagine debt as
an original sin, and you quickly understand the German attitude towards
nonpayment of debt.
But as good citizens of the world—the secular version of being good
Christians—the Germans are leading the way in doing what’s right to ameliorate
the fates of those displaced by the tragic Syrian civil war. They don’t
look at the Syrian and other refugees as profligates the way they characterized
Greece for not paying its debts, letting itself become a nation of tax
scofflaws, not exercising discipline and not following the rules. No, the
Syrians are innocent victims who require not just our empathy but our help.
When you add it up, it’s a kind of “tough love” approach to foreign affairs.
Let’s keep in mind, however, that even as it takes on the
massively expensive job of integrating 800,000 refugees into its economy and
society, Germany is acting its own self-interest, following the ethical
capitalist creed to do well by doing good.
Like the rest of Western Europe and the United States net of its
immigrants, Germany is experiencing negative population growth. The influx of
800,000 new workers and consumers will be a shot in the arm to the German
economy.
Would that the rest of Europe and the United States followed
the German model and opened its doors to more immigration from refugees and
others. The West faces a population bust and must either get an influx of
younger workers from elsewhere or learn how to operate a stagnant, no-growth
economy. Instead of shifting into permanent decline, doesn’t it make sense to
feed new workers into the economy, and in the process, address the problems of less
stable, poorer nations?
People fear that immigrants take their jobs, even though
statistics show otherwise. People fear that immigrants suppress the wages of
the native born, and statistics disprove this myth, too. But most of all,
people in France, German, the United States, Great Britain and everywhere else
fear the “the stranger,” the other who may corrupt or dilute the culture.
There can be no doubt that a large influx of one culture
into another will change the larger culture. That’s why gefilte fish, matzah,
pizza, taco shells and soy sauce are on the shelves of every American
supermarket. But without enough people talking the language and following the
cultural norms that define a culture, the culture will shrivel up. Fewer
Germans having kids mean fewer Germans in the future, which certainly manifests
a decline in the culture. On the other hand, does it matter much what is the
color of the German citizen if he or she speaks German and studies Goethe and
Schiller in school?
The old racist Germany of Nazi days thought it did matter.
The new Germany—minus the usual small percentage of virulent racists—knows
better.
No comments:
Post a Comment