The logic of House Republicans should ring familiar to those
old-timers who lived through the Viet Nam War. What they want to do is “Destroy
the town to save it.”
The original quote was attributed to an unnamed U.S. officer by reporter Peter Arnett about the U.S. bombing of the city of Ben Tre: “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.”
The Republicans are using this logic in refusing to fund the
federal government unless Congress votes to postpone the implementation of the
Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. The
Republicans believe the new law is a disaster for the country, so they are
willing to shut down the government in their continued efforts to dismantle it.
But a government shutdown will be more of a disaster than
letting go into effect a law passed by Congress, signed by the President and
endorsed by the American people in the last presidential election. Most of the government will grind to a halt.
About 800,000 federal workers will lose their jobs for the duration. About 1.4
million active-duty military personnel must remain on duty unpaid. We’ll see
delays in processing passport and visa applications, issuing gun permits,
continuing U.S. bankruptcy court. All national parks and federal wildlife
refuges would be closed for the duration of the shutdown. Think of the loss of
status we will suffer in world markets and in other countries.
That sure sounds like destroying the town to save it to me.
Except for one thing: Just as U.S. carpet bombing was unable
to stop the rise of the Viet Cong nationalists, defunding our federal
government won’t affect the timetable for starting exchanges or other major
elements of the new healthcare law. The Internal Revenue Service will still
collect the new taxes mandated by the Affordable Care Act.
The “destroy the town to save it” logic is merely stupid. But
the other piece of Republican House strategy reeks of venality and
cynicism. I’m referring to the idea—supported
by recent polls—that the American people will blame both Democrats and
Republicans equally for a government shutdown.
In other words, instead of treating the funding of the government and
the lifting of the debt ceiling as a matter of public interest, the Republicans
(and perhaps Democrats, too) see it as a political football to be tossed
around.
This strategy is likely to backfire. No matter what the polls
show, history suggests that once the government is shut down, the American
people will blame Republicans. It’s
similar to war situations. After we declare or invade a country, the American
public always rallies around the President, no matter how many people opposed
the war ahead of time.
I think government shutdowns are similar. Moreover, based on
the views expressed on the opinion pages so far, it’s likely that virtually the
entire mainstream media and significant parts of the right-wing media will
blame Republicans. Of course, Americans
might blame President Obama if the current House bill passes and the President
vetoes it, but rest assured, Senate Democrats won’t let that happen.
If we want to blame one person for this mess, it’s John
Boehner, who is all too willing to resort to the most irresponsible of actions
to placate radical Tea-partiers and keep his job as Speaker of the House. All
Boehner has to do to serve his country is release Congressional Republicans to
vote their conscious (or the will of their constituents) and thereby let enough
Republicans in blue states vote with Democrats to keep the government running.
Mr. Boehner, sir, it’s time to stand up and show a profile in courage.
No comments:
Post a Comment