The powers that be in Egypt seem to have the same view of
democracy as those in the United States have: it’s fine as long as we get our
way.
In the United States, they pass laws that make it harder for
people to vote in hopes of offloading minorities, the poor and students from
voter rolls to give future elections to right-wing conservatives. In Egypt they are taking a more violent
approach, first with a coup d’état that no one wants to call a coup d’état, and
then violently uprooting thousands of protesters, leading to the deaths of 525
and counting. The only coup d’état we’ve
had in the United States was in 2000, when the Supreme Court used dubious law
to declare George Bush (the Younger) the winner even though he lost the popular
vote by millions and probably also lost the electoral college before voter
manipulation.
Of course in the bad old days of southern overt resistance
to civil rights, those who wished to limit voting to Caucasians often resorted
to violence. We’ve come a long way,
baby!
All facetiousness aside, the United States is looking pretty
foolish today for not having immediately cut all aid to Egypt when the military
overturned the democratically elected government of the Muslim
Brotherhood. There was certainly a lot
of incompetence displayed by the Brotherhood in running the country, but if
incompetence was a justifiable excuse for overthrowing a legally elected
government, then we would have endured a number of coups in the United States
over the years, including to overthrow Bush II.
Our attitude towards democracy overseas has always been
ambivalent, because despite the flowery language about democracy our leaders
have spouted from Wilson to Obama, the main concern of American foreign policy
has always been to protect the interests of large American companies doing
business abroad, secure a cheap source of raw materials, specifically oil, and
open markets for American goods, including huge supplies of weapons. Democracy
is fine—as long as the democratically-elected government supports those goals.
The Egyptian military is dependent on U.S. aid, as is the
Egyptian economy, which was invoked as a reason for the coup. Would the
generals have produced a replay of Tiananmen Square if we had withheld all aid
until new elections had occurred?
More to the point, why aren’t we halting aid now? The pleas of
President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry for an end to violence on both
sides sound hollow in the wake of the slaughter of the protesters. Of course,
democracy plays little if no part in the equation for U.S. foreign policy
makers. It’s a beautiful word we like to throw around, but since we became
actively involved in world affairs sometime at the end of the 19th century, we’ve
been more concerned with creating stable governments. Military governments are
certainly more stable than democracies.
It’s time to freeze all aid to Egypt and organize our allies to put pressure on the Egyptian government for immediate elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment